Literature DB >> 29845371

[Syndesmosis injuries at the ankle].

S Rammelt1, E Manke2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis are frequent and continue to generate controversy due to an extensive range of diagnostic techniques and therapeutic options.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on syndesmotic instability and to present some recommendations for the clinical practice for acute an chronic injuries.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of the current literature concerning the anatomy, etiology, diagnostics and treatment of syndesmosis injuries.
RESULTS: Purely ligamentous injuries (high ankle sprains) are not associated with a latent or frank tibiofibular diastasis and can be treated with an extended protocol of physiotherapy. Relevant instability of the syndesmosis with diastasis results from rupture of two or more ligaments and requires surgical stabilization. Syndesmotic disruptions are commonly associated with bony avulsions or malleolar fractures. Treatment consists of anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the corresponding incisura of the distal tibia and stable fixation. The proposed means of fixation are one or more tibiofibular screws or suture button implants. There is no consensus on how long to maintain fixation. Both syndesmotic screws and suture buttons need to be removed if symptomatic. The most frequent complication is syndesmotic malreduction and can be minimized with direct visualization and intraoperative 3D scanning. Other complications include hardware failure, adhesions, heterotopic ossification, tibiofibular synostosis, chronic instability and posttraumatic arthritis.
CONCLUSION: The single most important prognostic factor after unstable injury of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with or without fracture is the anatomic reduction of the distal fibula and fitting into the tibial incisura.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Ankle sprains; Fixation; Instability; Rupture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845371     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0508-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  57 in total

1.  Late reconstruction of the anterior distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: good outcome in 9 patients.

Authors:  A Beumer; R P Heijboer; W P Fontijne; B A Swierstra
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-10

Review 2.  [Ligamentous injuries to the ankle joint].

Authors:  S Rammelt; W Schneiders; R Grass; S Rein; H Zwipp
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  Detection of fibular torsional deformities after surgery for ankle fractures with a novel CT method.

Authors:  Attila Vasarhelyi; Jessica Lubitz; Philip Gierer; Georg Gradl; Klaus Rösler; Werner Hopfenmüller; Kaj Klaue; Thomas W F Mittlmeier
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.

Authors:  Mélissa Laflamme; Etienne L Belzile; Luc Bédard; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Mark Glazebrook; Stéphane Pelet
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  [Malleolar fractures].

Authors:  U Heim
Journal:  Unfallheilkunde       Date:  1983-06

7.  A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation.

Authors:  Mikko T Ovaska; Tatu J Mäkinen; Rami Madanat; Veikko Kiljunen; Jan Lindahl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The tibiofibular line: an anatomical feature to diagnose syndesmosis malposition.

Authors:  Peter Blair Gifford; Michael Lutz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 9.  Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Glenn N Williams; Morgan H Jones; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Ankle syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Charalampos Zalavras; David Thordarson
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of ankle fractures: operative techniques : Standards, tips and pitfalls].

Authors:  Konrad Kamin; Dmitri Notov; Christian Kleber; Onays Al-Sadi; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany.

Authors:  Manuel Mutschler; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Thomas R Pfeiffer; Vera Jaecker; Dariusch Arbab; Sven Shafizadeh; Tomas Buchhorn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  [Treatment of ankle fractures : Standards, tricks and pitfalls].

Authors:  Konrad Kamin; Dmitri Notov; Onays Al-Sadi; Christian Kleber; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.