Literature DB >> 31863161

New landmarks for ideal positioning of syndesmotic screw: a computerised tomography based analysis and radiographic simulation.

Arvind Kumar1, Jigyasa Passey2, Lakshay Goel3, Dushyant Chouhan4, Akhil Agnihotri5, Shishir Chauhan6, Surabhi Gupta7, Rizwan Khan8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A lack of specific intra-operative markers for accurate positioning of the syndesmotic screw can result in its malpositioning. Knowledge of the axial orientation of the syndesmosis can help in reducing this risk of malpositioning of the syndesmotic screw. In this CT-based study, we investigated the axial relationships of intact syndesmoses with various rigid bony landmarks around the ankle joint that were independent of foot and horizontal plane.
METHODS: We analyzed 126 CT-based studies of uninjured normal ankle joints and defined the following bony landmarks: posteromedial and posterolateral surface of the distal tibia, bimalleolar tips, and anterior and posterior extents of both malleoli. Axial differences between coronal plane through the central axis of syndesmosis and modified coronal planes through these bony landmarks were then measured. Software-based lateral radiographs were created with the reference coronal plane for each radiograph being kept perpendicular to the plane of the viewing screen.
RESULTS: The mean axial differences parting the syndesmotic axis from the modified coronal planes based on distal tibial posteromedial surface, distal tibial posterolateral surface, bimalleolar tips, anterior bimalleolar extents, and posterior bimalleolar extents were - 3.15°, 13.73°, 4.10°, 11.95°, and 12.24°, respectively. With the exception of the posterolateral surface of the distal tibia, all other bony landmarks were radiologically identifiable in the majority of cases.
CONCLUSION: Our study attempts to provide a solution to the issues related to malpositioning of the syndesmotic screw by providing new bony landmarks that can be clinically and fluoroscopically used for syndesmotic-screw positioning. The relationships of bimalleolar tips, anterior and posterior bimalleolar extents, and the posteromedial surface can be reliably used as landmarks for directing syndesmotic screws.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Bony landmarks; CT-based simulation; Syndesmosis; Syndesmotic axis; Syndesmotic screw

Year:  2019        PMID: 31863161     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04467-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  14 in total

Review 1.  Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Mike Hogervorst; Hugo W Bolhuis; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 2.  Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  R Dattani; S Patnaik; A Kantak; B Srikanth; T P Selvan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-04

3.  Tibiotalar contact area and pressure distribution: the effect of mortise widening and syndesmosis fixation.

Authors:  D S Pereira; K J Koval; R B Resnick; S C Sheskier; F Kummer; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; J Rollins
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  CT characterizing the anatomy of uninjured ankle syndesmosis.

Authors:  Elliot S Mendelsohn; C Max Hoshino; Thomas G Harris; Daniel M Zinar
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Syndesmotic screw placement: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  A McBryde; B Chiasson; A Wilhelm; F Donovan; T Ray; P Bacilla
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; A O Mekhail; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Hossein Elgafy; Hassan B Semaan; Brian Blessinger; Andrew Wassef; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Ideal angle of syndesmotic screw fixation: A CT-based cross-sectional image analysis study.

Authors:  Young Hwan Park; Won Seok Choi; Gi Won Choi; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 10.  Injuries to the ankle syndesmosis.

Authors:  Tyler J Van Heest; Paul M Lafferty
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of unstable ankle fracture (type Weber C), osteosynthesis and syndesmotic transfixation on position of fibula in tibiofibular notch: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Maxim Privalov; Benedict Swartman; Nils Beisemann; Jan El Barbari; Jochen Franke; Paul Alfred Grützner; Sven Vetter
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Does the orientation of syndesmosis fixative device affect the immediate reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint?

Authors:  Robert Hennings; Ulrich J Spiegl; Carolin Fuchs; Pierre Hepp; Johannes K M Fakler; Annette B Ahrberg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.928

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.