Literature DB >> 24252712

Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).

Caroline J Hollins Martin1, Colin R Martin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to assess factor structure, validity and reliability of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and to develop a short-form version of the tool.
DESIGN: a quantitative design focused on evaluating psychometric properties of the BSS using factor structure, internal consistency, divergent reliability and known groups validity.
SETTING: Ayrshire Maternity Unit community midwife bases that serve the obstetric population of Ayrshire, Scotland (UK). PARTICIPANTS: a convenience sample of healthy women (n=228) <10 days post partum who had delivered a term infant. Data was collected from October 2010 to January 2011. MEASUREMENT: the BSS contains 30 self report items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale that measure women's perceptions of: (1) quality of care provision, (2) women's personal attributes, and (3) stress experienced during labour (8, 8 and 14 items per factor).
FINDINGS: post data analysis the BSS was reconfigured into the 10 item BSS-Revised (BSS-R) comprised of three sub-scales that measure distinct but correlated domains of: (1) quality of care provision, (2) women's personal attributes, and (3) stress experienced during labour. These domains now consist of relatively few items (4, 2 and 4 items per factor), but offer a good fit to the data. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: the BSS-R would appear to be a robust, valid and reliable multidimensional psychometric instrument for measuring postnatal women's birth satisfaction. Further research to confirm the veracity of the instruments measurement properties highlighted in the current study is desirable. The BSS-R is available for use at a national/international level from the first author.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS); Labour; Midwifery; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24252712     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  28 in total

1.  Grand Multiparous Mothers' Embodied Experiences of Natural and Technological Altered Births.

Authors:  Susan E Fleming; Roxanne Vandermause; Michele Shaw; Billie Severtsen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2017

2.  Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Nigel J Lee; Jeremy Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Sue V Kildea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

3.  The Role of Personality Traits and Delivery Experience in Fear of Childbirth: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Sandra Nakić Radoš; Lana Žigić Antić; Nataša Jokić-Begić
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2022-01-15

4.  Standardized Cesarean Risk Counseling with Induction: Impact on Racial Disparities in Birth Satisfaction.

Authors:  Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas; Jennifer Mccoy; Knashawn H Morales; Lisa D Levine
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The ICHOM Standard Set for Pregnancy and Childbirth - Translation and Linguistic Adaptation for Germany.

Authors:  Claudia Hartmann; Matthias Rose; Alexander Weichert; Karen Weißhaupt
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Coping With the Unexpected in Childbirth: A Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Hinic
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2021-07-01

7.  Childbirth experience and practice changing during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Annalisa Inversetti; Simona Fumagalli; Antonella Nespoli; Laura Antolini; Serena Mussi; Debora Ferrari; Anna Locatelli
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-05-18

8.  Preferences and Barriers to Counseling for and Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence, Depression, Anxiety, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Postpartum Women: Study Protocol of the Cross-Sectional Study INVITE.

Authors:  Lara Seefeld; Amera Mojahed; Freya Thiel; Julia Schellong; Susan Garthus-Niegel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Using mixed methods to evaluate perceived quality of care in southern Tanzania.

Authors:  Tara Tancred; Joanna Schellenberg; Tanya Marchant
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Determining the psychometric properties of the Enhancing Decision-making Assessment in Midwifery (EDAM) measure in a cross cultural context.

Authors:  Elaine Jefford; Julie Jomeen; Colin R Martin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.