Literature DB >> 28936715

Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Nigel J Lee1,2, Jeremy Neal3, Nancy K Lowe4, Sue V Kildea5,6.   

Abstract

Backgound Partographs are used in many labour settings to provide a pictorial overview of a woman's cervical dilation pattern in the first stage of labor and to alert clinicians to slow progress possibly requiring intervention. Recent reviews called for large trials to establish the efficacy of partographs to improve birth outcomes whilst highlighting issues of clinician compliance with use. Previous studies have also reported issues with participant recruitment related to concerns regarding the possibility of a longer labour. Objectives We sought to compare a standard partograph with an action line, to a newly designed partograph with a stepped line, to determine the feasibility of recruitment to a larger clinical trial. Methods A pragmatic, single-blind randomised trial wherein low-risk, nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term were randomized to an action-line or stepped-line partograph. First stage labour management was guided by the allocated partograph. Primary outcomes included the proportion of eligible women recruited, reasons for failed recruitment and compliance with partograph use. Secondary outcomes included rates of intervention, mode of birth, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results Of the 384 potentially eligible participants, 38% (149/384) were approached. Of these 77% (116/149) consented, with 85% (99/116) randomized, only nine women approached (6%) declined to participate. A further 9% (14/149) who were consented antenatally were not eligible at onset of labor and 7% (10/149) of women approached in the birth suite but did not meet the inclusion criteria. Compliance with partograph completion was 65% (action) versus 84% (dystocia line). Conclusions for Practice Participant recruitment to a larger randomized controlled trial comparing new labour management guidelines to standard care is feasible. Effective strategies to improve partograph completion compliance would be required to maintain trial fidelity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action line partograph; First stage labor; Labor dystocia; Partogram; Partograph; Stepped line partograph

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28936715     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  25 in total

1.  Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales.

Authors:  Alexandra Rouquette; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Perils of the new labor management guidelines.

Authors:  Wayne R Cohen; Emanuel A Friedman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. II. The action line and treatment of abnormal labour.

Authors:  R H Philpott; W M Castle
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1972-07

5.  Misguided guidelines for managing labor.

Authors:  Wayne R Cohen; Emanuel A Friedman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Changes in labor patterns over 50 years.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Julie Beaver; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Knowledge and utilization of the partograph among midwives in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.

Authors:  Margaret M Opiah; Abosede Bola Ofi; Ekere James Essien; Emmanuel Monjok
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2012-03

8.  Active management of labour.

Authors:  K O'Driscoll; J M Stronge; M Minogue
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-07-21

9.  An IV for the RCT: using instrumental variables to adjust for treatment contamination in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jeremy B Sussman; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-05-04

10.  Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ben Fletcher; Adrian Gheorghe; David Moore; Sue Wilson; Sarah Damery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of painless delivery on the maternal and neonatal outcomes under the guidance of new concept of labor.

Authors:  Xing Li; Cailiang Wu; Xuexin Zhou; Jin Zhang; Huifang Lu; Shuying Chen; Xianming Xu; Hao Wu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.