PURPOSE: To study the impact of achieving stringent complete response (sCR), an increasingly attainable goal, after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximal response rates were determined in 445 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis of MM. The patients achieving varying degrees of complete response (CR) are the focus of our study. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients (25%) achieved sCR after ASCT. The median overall survival (OS) rate from the time of transplantation for patients attaining sCR was not reached (NR), in contrast to those patients achieving conventional complete response (CR; n = 37; OS, 81 months) or near CR (nCR; n = 91; OS, 60 months; P < .001). Five-year OS rates were 80%, 53%, and 47% for sCR, CR, and nCR, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) from ASCT of patients achieving sCR was significantly longer (50 months) than TTP of patients achieving CR or nCR (20 months and 19 months, respectively). On multivariable analysis, post-ASCT response of sCR was an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.80; versus CR; P = .008), in addition to proliferation rate, pre-ASCT cytogenetics, and performance status. OS rates of patients attaining sCR continued to remain superior at 2-year landmark (median, NR v 70 months for conventional CR group; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Improved long-term outcome is seen after ASCT with achievement of sCR when compared with lesser degrees of responses. Myeloma trials reporting the response rates should identify patients achieving sCR and CR separately, owing to markedly disparate outcomes of the two categories.
PURPOSE: To study the impact of achieving stringent complete response (sCR), an increasingly attainable goal, after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximal response rates were determined in 445 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis of MM. The patients achieving varying degrees of complete response (CR) are the focus of our study. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients (25%) achieved sCR after ASCT. The median overall survival (OS) rate from the time of transplantation for patients attaining sCR was not reached (NR), in contrast to those patients achieving conventional complete response (CR; n = 37; OS, 81 months) or near CR (nCR; n = 91; OS, 60 months; P < .001). Five-year OS rates were 80%, 53%, and 47% for sCR, CR, and nCR, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) from ASCT of patients achieving sCR was significantly longer (50 months) than TTP of patients achieving CR or nCR (20 months and 19 months, respectively). On multivariable analysis, post-ASCT response of sCR was an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.80; versus CR; P = .008), in addition to proliferation rate, pre-ASCT cytogenetics, and performance status. OS rates of patients attaining sCR continued to remain superior at 2-year landmark (median, NR v 70 months for conventional CR group; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Improved long-term outcome is seen after ASCT with achievement of sCR when compared with lesser degrees of responses. Myeloma trials reporting the response rates should identify patients achieving sCR and CR separately, owing to markedly disparate outcomes of the two categories.
Authors: Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; David Dingli; Francesca Gay; Shirshendu Sinha; Nelson Leung; William Hogan; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Joan Blade; María-Victoria Mateos; Carlos Grande; Adrián Alegre; José García-Laraña; Anna Sureda; Javier de la Rubia; Eulogio Conde; Rafael Martinez; Felipe de Arriba; Maria C Viguria; Joan Besalduch; Rafael Cabrera; José D Gonzalez-San Miguel; José Luis Guzman-Zamudio; Maria Carmen Gomez del Castillo; José Maria Moraleda; Juan C García-Ruiz; Jesús San Miguel; Juan José Lahuerta Journal: Blood Date: 2011-04-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S Vincent Rajkumar; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Brian Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Joan Blade; Paul Richardson; Robert Orlowski; David Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Antonio Palumbo; Jeffrey Zonder; Heinz Ludwig; David Vesole; Orhan Sezer; Nikhil C Munshi; Jesus San Miguel Journal: Blood Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Bruno Paiva; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Maria-Belen Vidriales; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Maria-Angeles Montalban; Elena Fernandez-Redondo; Lourdes Alonso; Albert Oriol; Ana-Isabel Teruel; Raquel de Paz; José-Garcia Laraña; Enrique Bengoechea; Alejandro Martin; Joaquin Diaz Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Joan Bladé; Alberto Orfao; Juan-Jose Lahuerta; Jesus F San Miguel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bart Barlogie; Elias Anaissie; Jeffrey Haessler; Fritz van Rhee; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Klaus Hollmig; Yazan Alsayed; Joshua Epstein; John D Shaughnessy; John Crowley Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Dispenzieri; R Kyle; G Merlini; J S Miguel; H Ludwig; R Hajek; A Palumbo; S Jagannath; J Blade; S Lonial; M Dimopoulos; R Comenzo; H Einsele; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; J L Harousseau; M Attal; P Tosi; P Sonneveld; M Boccadoro; G Morgan; P Richardson; O Sezer; M V Mateos; M Cavo; D Joshua; I Turesson; W Chen; K Shimizu; R Powles; S V Rajkumar; B G M Durie Journal: Leukemia Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Juan José Lahuerta; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joaquin Martínez-López; Laura Rosiñol; Anna Sureda; Javier de la Rubia; José García-Laraña; Rafael Martínez-Martínez; Miguel T Hernández-García; Dolores Carrera; Joan Besalduch; Felipe de Arriba; José María Ribera; Lourdes Escoda; Belén Hernández-Ruiz; Javier García-Frade; Concepción Rivas-González; Adrían Alegre; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter M Voorhees; Jonathan L Kaufman; Jacob Laubach; Douglas W Sborov; Brandi Reeves; Cesar Rodriguez; Ajai Chari; Rebecca Silbermann; Luciano J Costa; Larry D Anderson; Nitya Nathwani; Nina Shah; Yvonne A Efebera; Sarah A Holstein; Caitlin Costello; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Tanya M Wildes; Robert Z Orlowski; Kenneth H Shain; Andrew J Cowan; Sean Murphy; Yana Lutska; Huiling Pei; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Carla de Boer; Daniela Hoehn; Thomas S Lin; Paul G Richardson Journal: Blood Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A P Nair; P Walker; A Kalff; K Bergin; J Hocking; S Avery; D J Curtis; S Patil; T Das; D Klarica; S Morgan; J Muirhead; M Gorniak; J Reynolds; A Spencer Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: W I Gonsalves; S V Rajkumar; M A Gertz; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; D Dingli; R S Go; N Leung; P Kapoor; S R Hayman; J A Lust; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; Y L Hwa; T V Kourelis; R A Kyle; S K Kumar Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 5.483