Literature DB >> 24248686

Importance of achieving stringent complete response after autologous stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Prashant Kapoor1, Shaji K Kumar, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Q Lacy, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Stephen J Russell, Suzanne R Hayman, Thomas E Witzig, John A Lust, Nelson Leung, Yi Lin, Steven R Zeldenrust, Arleigh McCurdy, Philip R Greipp, Robert A Kyle, S Vincent Rajkumar, Morie A Gertz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the impact of achieving stringent complete response (sCR), an increasingly attainable goal, after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximal response rates were determined in 445 consecutive patients who underwent ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis of MM. The patients achieving varying degrees of complete response (CR) are the focus of our study.
RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients (25%) achieved sCR after ASCT. The median overall survival (OS) rate from the time of transplantation for patients attaining sCR was not reached (NR), in contrast to those patients achieving conventional complete response (CR; n = 37; OS, 81 months) or near CR (nCR; n = 91; OS, 60 months; P < .001). Five-year OS rates were 80%, 53%, and 47% for sCR, CR, and nCR, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) from ASCT of patients achieving sCR was significantly longer (50 months) than TTP of patients achieving CR or nCR (20 months and 19 months, respectively). On multivariable analysis, post-ASCT response of sCR was an independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.80; versus CR; P = .008), in addition to proliferation rate, pre-ASCT cytogenetics, and performance status. OS rates of patients attaining sCR continued to remain superior at 2-year landmark (median, NR v 70 months for conventional CR group; P = .007).
CONCLUSION: Improved long-term outcome is seen after ASCT with achievement of sCR when compared with lesser degrees of responses. Myeloma trials reporting the response rates should identify patients achieving sCR and CR separately, owing to markedly disparate outcomes of the two categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24248686      PMCID: PMC3871514          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.0086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  38 in total

1.  Early versus delayed autologous transplantation after immunomodulatory agents-based induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Francis K Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; David Dingli; Francesca Gay; Shirshendu Sinha; Nelson Leung; William Hogan; S Vincent Rajkumar; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Joan Blade; María-Victoria Mateos; Carlos Grande; Adrián Alegre; José García-Laraña; Anna Sureda; Javier de la Rubia; Eulogio Conde; Rafael Martinez; Felipe de Arriba; Maria C Viguria; Joan Besalduch; Rafael Cabrera; José D Gonzalez-San Miguel; José Luis Guzman-Zamudio; Maria Carmen Gomez del Castillo; José Maria Moraleda; Juan C García-Ruiz; Jesús San Miguel; Juan José Lahuerta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Brian Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Joan Blade; Paul Richardson; Robert Orlowski; David Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Antonio Palumbo; Jeffrey Zonder; Heinz Ludwig; David Vesole; Orhan Sezer; Nikhil C Munshi; Jesus San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus reduced-dose bortezomib, thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Thierry Facon; Michel Attal; Mourad Tiab; Cyrille Hulin; Chantal Doyen; Laurent Garderet; Edouard Randriamalala; Carla Araujo; Gérard Lepeu; Gerald Marit; Denis Caillot; Martine Escoffre; Bruno Lioure; Lotfi Benboubker; Brigitte Pégourié; Brigitte Kolb; Anne Marie Stoppa; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Olivier Decaux; Mamoun Dib; Christian Berthou; Carine Chaleteix; Catherine Sebban; Catherine Traullé; Jean Fontan; Marc Wetterwald; Pascal Lenain; Claire Mathiot; Jean-Luc Harousseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Comparison of immunofixation, serum free light chain, and immunophenotyping for response evaluation and prognostication in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Maria-Belen Vidriales; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Maria-Angeles Montalban; Elena Fernandez-Redondo; Lourdes Alonso; Albert Oriol; Ana-Isabel Teruel; Raquel de Paz; José-Garcia Laraña; Enrique Bengoechea; Alejandro Martin; Joaquin Diaz Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Joan Bladé; Alberto Orfao; Juan-Jose Lahuerta; Jesus F San Miguel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with autografted myeloma.

Authors:  Marco Ladetto; Gloria Pagliano; Simone Ferrero; Federica Cavallo; Daniela Drandi; Loredana Santo; Claudia Crippa; Luca De Rosa; Patrizia Pregno; Mariella Grasso; Anna Marina Liberati; Tommaso Caravita; Francesco Pisani; Tommasina Guglielmelli; Vincenzo Callea; Pellegrino Musto; Clotilde Cangialosi; Roberto Passera; Mario Boccadoro; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Complete remission sustained 3 years from treatment initiation is a powerful surrogate for extended survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Elias Anaissie; Jeffrey Haessler; Fritz van Rhee; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Klaus Hollmig; Yazan Alsayed; Joshua Epstein; John D Shaughnessy; John Crowley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  High-dose intravenous melphalan for plasma-cell leukaemia and myeloma.

Authors:  T J McElwain; R L Powles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Authors:  A Dispenzieri; R Kyle; G Merlini; J S Miguel; H Ludwig; R Hajek; A Palumbo; S Jagannath; J Blade; S Lonial; M Dimopoulos; R Comenzo; H Einsele; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; J L Harousseau; M Attal; P Tosi; P Sonneveld; M Boccadoro; G Morgan; P Richardson; O Sezer; M V Mateos; M Cavo; D Joshua; I Turesson; W Chen; K Shimizu; R Powles; S V Rajkumar; B G M Durie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival.

Authors:  Juan José Lahuerta; Maria Victoria Mateos; Joaquin Martínez-López; Laura Rosiñol; Anna Sureda; Javier de la Rubia; José García-Laraña; Rafael Martínez-Martínez; Miguel T Hernández-García; Dolores Carrera; Joan Besalduch; Felipe de Arriba; José María Ribera; Lourdes Escoda; Belén Hernández-Ruiz; Javier García-Frade; Concepción Rivas-González; Adrían Alegre; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  52 in total

1.  Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial.

Authors:  Peter M Voorhees; Jonathan L Kaufman; Jacob Laubach; Douglas W Sborov; Brandi Reeves; Cesar Rodriguez; Ajai Chari; Rebecca Silbermann; Luciano J Costa; Larry D Anderson; Nitya Nathwani; Nina Shah; Yvonne A Efebera; Sarah A Holstein; Caitlin Costello; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Tanya M Wildes; Robert Z Orlowski; Kenneth H Shain; Andrew J Cowan; Sean Murphy; Yana Lutska; Huiling Pei; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Carla de Boer; Daniela Hoehn; Thomas S Lin; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Haematological cancer: the importance of being stringent.

Authors:  M Teresa Villanueva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Consolidation and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous transplantation: where do we stand?

Authors:  M Mohty; P G Richardson; P L McCarthy; M Attal
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Smoldering multiple myeloma: special considerations surrounding treatment on versus off clinical trials.

Authors:  Elisabet E Manasanch; Neha Korde; Sham Mailankody; Nishant Tageja; Manisha Bhutani; Mark Roschewski; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 5.  Minimal residual disease testing after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sherrod; P Hari; C A Mosse; R C Walker; R F Cornell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Adverse impact of high donor CD3+ cell dose on outcome following tandem auto-NMA allogeneic transplantation for high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  A P Nair; P Walker; A Kalff; K Bergin; J Hocking; S Avery; D J Curtis; S Patil; T Das; D Klarica; S Morgan; J Muirhead; M Gorniak; J Reynolds; A Spencer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Post-Transplant Outcomes in High-Risk Compared with Non-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A CIBMTR Analysis.

Authors:  Emma C Scott; Parameswaran Hari; Manish Sharma; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Jiaxing Huang; Dan Vogl; Muneer Abidi; Amer Beitinjaneh; Henry Fung; Siddhartha Ganguly; Gerhard Hildebrandt; Leona Holmberg; Matt Kalaycio; Shaji Kumar; Robert Kyle; Hillard Lazarus; Cindy Lee; Richard T Maziarz; Kenneth Meehan; Joseph Mikhael; Taiga Nishihori; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Saad Usmani; Jason Tay; David Vesole; Baldeep Wirk; Jean Yared; Bipin N Savani; Cristina Gasparetto; Amrita Krishnan; Tomer Mark; Yago Nieto; Anita D'Souza
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Controversies in multiple myeloma: to transplant or not?

Authors:  Isabel Ruth Preeshagul; Koen Van Besien; Tomer M Mark
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Clinical course and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma who relapse after autologous stem cell therapy.

Authors:  W I Gonsalves; S V Rajkumar; M A Gertz; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; D Dingli; R S Go; N Leung; P Kapoor; S R Hayman; J A Lust; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; Y L Hwa; T V Kourelis; R A Kyle; S K Kumar
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.