Literature DB >> 21482708

Long-term prognostic significance of response in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Joaquin Martinez-Lopez1, Joan Blade, María-Victoria Mateos, Carlos Grande, Adrián Alegre, José García-Laraña, Anna Sureda, Javier de la Rubia, Eulogio Conde, Rafael Martinez, Felipe de Arriba, Maria C Viguria, Joan Besalduch, Rafael Cabrera, José D Gonzalez-San Miguel, José Luis Guzman-Zamudio, Maria Carmen Gomez del Castillo, José Maria Moraleda, Juan C García-Ruiz, Jesús San Miguel, Juan José Lahuerta.   

Abstract

For establishing the true effect of different response categories in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with autologous stem cell transplantation, we evaluated, after a median follow-up of 153 months, 344 patients with MM who received a transplant between 1989 and 1998. Overall survival (OS) at 12 years was 35% in complete response (CR) patients, 22% in near complete response (nCR), 16% in very good partial response (VGPR), and 16% in partial response (PR) groups. Significant differences in OS and progression-free survival were found between CR and nCR groups (P = .01 and P = .002, respectively), between CR and VGPR groups (P = .0001 and P = .003), or between CR and PR groups (P = .003 and P = < 10(-5)); no differences were observed between the nCR and VGPR groups (P = .2 and P = .9) or between these groups and the PR group (P = .1 and P = .8). A landmark study found a plateau phase in OS after 11 years; 35% patients in the CR group and 11% in the nCR+VGPR+PR group are alive at 17 years; 2 cases had relapsed in the nCR+VGPR+PR group. In conclusion, MM achieving CR after autologous stem cell transplantation is a central prognostic factor. The relapse rate is low in patients with > 11 years of follow-up, possibly signifying a cure for patients in CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482708     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-332320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  67 in total

1.  Analysis of the immune system of multiple myeloma patients achieving long-term disease control by multidimensional flow cytometry.

Authors:  Roberto J Pessoa de Magalhães; María-Belén Vidriales; Bruno Paiva; Carlos Fernandez-Gimenez; Ramón García-Sanz; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; Quentin Lecrevisse; Juan F Blanco; Jose Hernández; Natalia de las Heras; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Monica Roig; Elaine Sobral Costa; Enrique M Ocio; Martin Perez-Andres; Angelo Maiolino; Marcio Nucci; Javier De La Rubia; Juan-Jose Lahuerta; Jesús F San-Miguel; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Natural killer cell lines preferentially kill clonogenic multiple myeloma cells and decrease myeloma engraftment in a bioluminescent xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Brenna E Swift; Brent A Williams; Yoko Kosaka; Xing-Hua Wang; Jeffrey A Medin; Sowmya Viswanathan; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Armand Keating
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Reduction in plasma cell proliferation after initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma measures treatment response and predicts improved survival.

Authors:  Jeremy T Larsen; Cheng E Chee; John A Lust; Philip R Greipp; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Proceedings from the National Cancer Institute's Second International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: part II. Autologous Transplantation-novel agents and immunomodulatory strategies.

Authors:  David Avigan; Parameswaran Hari; Minoo Battiwalla; Michael R Bishop; Sergio A Giralt; Nancy M Hardy; Nicolaus Kröger; Alan S Wayne; Katharine C Hsu
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [Therapy of multiple myeloma. What is confirmed?].

Authors:  D Peest; A Ganser; H Einsele
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Can multiple myeloma become a curable disease?

Authors:  Jesús F San-Miguel; María-Victoria Mateos
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 7.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease: impact of autologous stem cell transplantation on outcome.

Authors:  L Kumar; R Gogi; A K Patel; A Mookerjee; R K Sahoo; P S Malik; A Sharma; S Thulkar; R Kumar; A Biswas; O D Sharma; R Gupta
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.483

9.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 10.  The Tao of myeloma.

Authors:  Lawrence H Boise; Jonathan L Kaufman; Nizar J Bahlis; Sagar Lonial; Kelvin P Lee
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.