Literature DB >> 27496215

Post-Transplant Outcomes in High-Risk Compared with Non-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A CIBMTR Analysis.

Emma C Scott1, Parameswaran Hari2, Manish Sharma3, Jennifer Le-Rademacher4, Jiaxing Huang2, Dan Vogl5, Muneer Abidi6, Amer Beitinjaneh7, Henry Fung8, Siddhartha Ganguly9, Gerhard Hildebrandt10, Leona Holmberg11, Matt Kalaycio12, Shaji Kumar13, Robert Kyle13, Hillard Lazarus14, Cindy Lee15, Richard T Maziarz16, Kenneth Meehan17, Joseph Mikhael18, Taiga Nishihori19, Muthalagu Ramanathan20, Saad Usmani21, Jason Tay22, David Vesole23, Baldeep Wirk24, Jean Yared25, Bipin N Savani26, Cristina Gasparetto27, Amrita Krishnan28, Tomer Mark29, Yago Nieto30, Anita D'Souza31.   

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetics and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identify high-risk multiple myeloma (HRM) populations characterized by poor outcomes. We analyzed these differences among HRM versus non-HRM populations after upfront autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT). Between 2008 and 2012, 715 patients with multiple myeloma identified by FISH and/or cytogenetic data with upfront autoHCT were identified in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. HRM was defined as del17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), hypodiploidy (<45 chromosomes excluding -Y) or chromosome 1 p and 1q abnormalities; all others were non-HRM. Among 125 HRM patients (17.5%), induction with bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents (imids) was higher compared with non-HRM (56% versus 43%, P < .001) with similar pretransplant complete response (CR) rates (14% versus 16%, P .1). At day 100 post-transplant, at least a very good partial response was 59% in HRM and 61% in non-HRM (P = .6). More HRM patients received post-transplant therapy with bortezomib and imids (26% versus 12%, P = .004). Three-year post-transplant progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in HRM versus non-HRM were 37% versus 49% (P < .001) and 72% versus 85% (P < .001), respectively. At 3 years, PFS for HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33 to 59) versus 14% (95% CI, 4 to 29) and in non-HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy 55% (95% CI, 49 to 62) versus 39% (95% CI, 32 to 47); rates of OS for HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy were 81% (95% CI, 70 to 90) versus 48% (95% CI, 30 to 65) compared with 88% (95% CI, 84 to 92) and 79% (95% CI, 73 to 85) in non-HRM patients with and without post-transplant therapy, respectively. Among patients receiving post-transplant therapy, there was no difference in OS between HRM and non-HRM (P = .08). In addition to HRM, higher stage, less than a CR pretransplant, lack of post-transplant therapy, and African American race were associated with worse OS. In conclusion, we show HRM patients achieve similar day 100 post-transplant responses compared with non-HRM patients, but these responses are not sustained. Post-transplant therapy appeared to improve the poor outcomes of HRM.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous HSCT; High risk; Maintenance; Multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496215      PMCID: PMC5090978          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

1.  Genetic risk identifies multiple myeloma patients who do not benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  H Chang; X Y Qi; S Samiee; Q-L Yi; C Chen; S Trudel; J Mikhael; D Reece; A K Stewart
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal; Philippe Moreau; Catherine Charbonnel; Frédéric Garban; Cyrille Hulin; Serge Leyvraz; Mauricette Michallet; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Laurent Garderet; Gérald Marit; Lucienne Michaux; Laurent Voillat; Marc Renaud; Bernard Grosbois; Gaelle Guillerm; Lotfi Benboubker; Mathieu Monconduit; Catherine Thieblemont; Philippe Casassus; Denis Caillot; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Jean-Jacques Sotto; Marc Wetterwald; Charles Dumontet; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Isabelle Azais; Véronique Dorvaux; Marc Zandecki; Régis Bataille; Stéphane Minvielle; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Thierry Facon; Claire Mathiot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Ingo G H Schmidt-Wolf; Bronno van der Holt; Laila El Jarari; Uta Bertsch; Hans Salwender; Sonja Zweegman; Edo Vellenga; Annemiek Broyl; Igor W Blau; Katja C Weisel; Shulamiet Wittebol; Gerard M J Bos; Marian Stevens-Kroef; Christof Scheid; Michael Pfreundschuh; Dirk Hose; Anna Jauch; Helgi van der Velde; Reinier Raymakers; Martijn R Schaafsma; Marie-Jose Kersten; Marinus van Marwijk-Kooy; Ulrich Duehrsen; Walter Lindemann; Pierre W Wijermans; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut M Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson; P Leif Bergsagel; John Shaughnessy; Antonio Palumbo; Brian Durie; Rafael Fonseca; A Keith Stewart; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Meletios Dimopoulos; Sundar Jagannath; Roman Hajek; Orhan Sezer; Robert Kyle; Pieter Sonneveld; Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus San Miguel; John Crowley; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor?

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Florent Malard; Loic Campion; Florence Magrangeas; Catherine Sebban; Bruno Lioure; Olivier Decaux; Thierry Lamy; Laurence Legros; Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet; Mauricette Michallet; Bernadette Corront; Pascal Lenain; Cyrille Hulin; Claire Mathiot; Michel Attal; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Stephane Minvielle; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Defining and treating high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Z Usmani; P Rodriguez-Otero; M Bhutani; M-V Mateos; J S Miguel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stefania Oliva; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Laura Rosinol; Paul Richardson; Simona Caltagirone; Juan José Lahuerta; Thierry Facon; Sara Bringhen; Francesca Gay; Michel Attal; Roberto Passera; Andrew Spencer; Massimo Offidani; Shaji Kumar; Pellegrino Musto; Sagar Lonial; Maria T Petrucci; Robert Z Orlowski; Elena Zamagni; Gareth Morgan; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Brian G M Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Pieter Sonneveld; Jésus San Miguel; Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review.

Authors:  R Fonseca; P L Bergsagel; J Drach; J Shaughnessy; N Gutierrez; A K Stewart; G Morgan; B Van Ness; M Chesi; S Minvielle; A Neri; B Barlogie; W M Kuehl; P Liebisch; F Davies; S Chen-Kiang; B G M Durie; R Carrasco; Orhan Sezer; Tony Reiman; Linda Pilarski; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  W J Chng; A Dispenzieri; C-S Chim; R Fonseca; H Goldschmidt; S Lentzsch; N Munshi; A Palumbo; J S Miguel; P Sonneveld; M Cavo; S Usmani; B G M Durie; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  12 in total

1.  Revised International Staging System Is Predictive and Prognostic for Early Relapse (<24 months) after Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Sathish Gopalakrishnan; Anita D'Souza; Emma Scott; Raphael Fraser; Omar Davila; Nina Shah; Robert Peter Gale; Rammurti Kamble; Miguel Angel Diaz; Hillard M Lazarus; Bipin N Savani; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Melhem Solh; Cesar O Freytes; Cindy Lee; Robert A Kyle; Saad Z Usmani; Siddhartha Ganguly; Amer Assal; Jesus Berdeja; Abraham S Kanate; Binod Dhakal; Kenneth Meehan; Tamila Kindwall-Keller; Ayman Saad; Frederick Locke; Sachiko Seo; Taiga Nishihori; Usama Gergis; Cristina Gasparetto; Tomer Mark; Yago Nieto; Shaji Kumar; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Evolution of Treatment Paradigms in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Radowan A Elnair; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities and survival of patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Smith Giri; Scott F Huntington; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Nikolai Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff; Natalia Neparidze
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma harboring chromosome 1q gain/amplification in the era of modern therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Cherng-Horng Wu; Janet M Cowan; Raymond L Comenzo; Cindy Varga
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lauren W Veltri; Denái R Milton; Ruby Delgado; Nina Shah; Krina Patel; Yago Nieto; Partow Kebriaei; Uday R Popat; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Stefan Ciurea; Chitra Hosing; Hans C Lee; Elisabet Manasanch; Robert Z Orlowski; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Novel prognostic scoring system for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Binod Dhakal; Anita D'Souza; Natalie Callander; Saurabh Chhabra; Raphael Fraser; Omar Davila; Kenneth Anderson; Amer Assal; Sherif M Badawy; Jesus Berdeja; Jan Cerny; Raymond Comenzo; Rajshekhar Chakraborty; Robert Peter Gale; Rammurti Kamble; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Maxwell Krem; Siddhartha Ganguly; Murali Janakiram; Ankit Kansagra; Reinhold Munker; Hemant Murthy; Sagar Patel; Shaji Kumar; Nina Shah; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Autologous/Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation versus Tandem Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Long-Term Postrelapse Survival.

Authors:  Myo Htut; Anita D'Souza; Amrita Krishnan; Benedetto Bruno; Mei-Jie Zhang; Mingwei Fei; Miguel Angel Diaz; Edward Copelan; Siddhartha Ganguly; Mehdi Hamadani; Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja; Hillard Lazarus; Cindy Lee; Kenneth Meehan; Taiga Nishihori; Ayman Saad; Sachiko Seo; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Saad Z Usmani; Christina Gasparetto; Tomer M Mark; Yago Nieto; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  γ-Secretase inhibition increases efficacy of BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Margot J Pont; Tyler Hill; Gabriel O Cole; Joe J Abbott; Jessica Kelliher; Alexander I Salter; Michael Hudecek; Melissa L Comstock; Anusha Rajan; Bharvin K R Patel; Jenna M Voutsinas; Qian Wu; Lingfeng Liu; Andrew J Cowan; Brent L Wood; Damian J Green; Stanley R Riddell
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmidt; Rafael Fonseca; Saad Z Usmani
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Racial disparity in utilization of therapeutic modalities among multiple myeloma patients: a SEER-medicare analysis.

Authors:  Sikander Ailawadhi; Ryan D Frank; Pooja Advani; Abhisek Swaika; M'hamed Temkit; Richa Menghani; Mayank Sharma; Zahara Meghji; Shumail Paulus; Nandita Khera; Shahrukh K Hashmi; Aneel Paulus; Tanya S Kakar; David O Hodge; Dorin T Colibaseanu; Michael R Vizzini; Vivek Roy; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Asher A Chanan-Khan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.