Literature DB >> 19001321

Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival.

Juan José Lahuerta1, Maria Victoria Mateos, Joaquin Martínez-López, Laura Rosiñol, Anna Sureda, Javier de la Rubia, José García-Laraña, Rafael Martínez-Martínez, Miguel T Hernández-García, Dolores Carrera, Joan Besalduch, Felipe de Arriba, José María Ribera, Lourdes Escoda, Belén Hernández-Ruiz, Javier García-Frade, Concepción Rivas-González, Adrían Alegre, Joan Bladé, Jesús F San Miguel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complete response (CR) is considered an important goal in most hematologic malignancies. However, in multiple myeloma (MM), there is no consensus regarding whether immunofixation (IF)-negative CR, IF-positive near-CR (nCR), and partial response (PR) are associated with different survivals. We evaluated the prognostic influence on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of these responses pre- and post-transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 632 patients from the prospective Grupo Español de Mieloma 2000 protocol who were uniformly treated with vincristine, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and predisone/vincristine, carmustine, adryamcine, and dexamethasone induction followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation.
RESULTS: Post-transplantation response markedly influenced outcomes. Patients achieving CR had significantly longer EFS (median, 61 v 40 months; P < 10(-5)) and OS (medians not reached; P = .01) versus patients achieving nCR, who likewise had somewhat better outcomes compared with patients achieving PR (median EFS, 34 months, P = .07 v nCR; median OS, 61 months, P = .04). EFS and OS and influence of response were similar among older (age 65 to 70 years) and younger (age < 65 years) patients. Similar findings were observed with pretransplantation response, with trends toward EFS (P = .1; P = .05) and OS (P = .1; P = .07) benefit in patients achieving CR versus nCR and PR, respectively. Post-transplantation response was markedly influenced by pretransplantation response; improvements in response were associated with prolonged survival.
CONCLUSION: Quality of response post-transplantation, notably CR, is significantly associated with EFS and OS prolongation in newly diagnosed patients with MM. There were trends toward similar associations with pretransplantation response status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001321     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  82 in total

1.  Phase 2 study of carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction/consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Emilie Asselbergs; Sonja Zweegman; Bronno van der Holt; Marie Jose Kersten; Edo Vellenga; Marinus van Marwijk-Kooy; Annemiek Broyl; Okke de Weerdt; Sarah Lonergan; Antonio Palumbo; Henk Lokhorst
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Novel drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Joan Bladé; Ma Teresa Cibeira; Laura Rosiñol
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Hematology: Bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jacob Laubach; Paul Richardson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study.

Authors:  S K Kumar; I Flinn; S J Noga; P Hari; R Rifkin; N Callander; M Bhandari; J L Wolf; C Gasparetto; A Krishnan; D Grosman; J Glass; E A Sahovic; H Shi; I J Webb; P G Richardson; S V Rajkumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Value of novel agents and intensive therapy for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Alexanian; M Wang; K Delasalle; S Wang; M Qazilbash; B Handy; D Weber
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Loss of quiescence and impaired function of CD34(+)/CD38(low) cells one year following autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Carolien M Woolthuis; Annet Z Brouwers-Vos; Gerwin Huls; Joost Th M de Wolf; Jan Jacob Schuringa; Edo Vellenga
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Current approaches to the initial treatment of symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jagoda K Jasielec; Andrzej J Jakubowiak
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-02

Review 9.  Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More.

Authors:  Ashley Rosko; Sergio Giralt; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

10.  A phase 1 study of bendamustine and melphalan conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tomer M Mark; Whitney Reid; Ruben Niesvizky; Usama Gergis; Roger Pearse; Sebastian Mayer; June Greenberg; Morton Coleman; Koen Van Besien; Tsiporah Shore
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.