| Literature DB >> 24235983 |
Stefano Vando1, Davide Filingeri, Lucio Maurino, Helmi Chaabène, Antonino Bianco, Gianluca Salernitano, Calogero Foti, Johnny Padulo.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of an increasing number of training hours of specific high-intensity karate training on postural sway in preadolescent karate athletes. Seventy-four karatekas were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: Karate Group (KG=37): age 10.29±1.68 yrs; or Control Group (CG= 37): age 10.06±1.77 yrs. The KG performed two sessions per day for 1 week in total, while the CG performed only 3 sessions during the same period. The center-of-pressure length (COPL) and velocity (COPV) were recorded under four different experimental conditions: open eyes (EO), closed eyes (EC), open eyes monopodalic left (EOL), open eyes monopodalic right (EOR), pre as well as post training intervention. Post-camp results indicated significant differences between the groups in the COPL p<0.001; an interaction of training type×time in the COPV (p<0.001) and an interaction of training type×time (p=0.020). The KG revealed an improvement in the COPL from pre to post-camp under conditions of EO [-37.26% (p<0.001)], EC [-31.72% (p<0.001)], EOL [-27.27% (p<0.001)], EOR [-21.44% (p<0.001)], while CG revealed small adaptations in conditions of EO (3.16%), EC (0.93%), EOL (-3.03%), EOR (-0.97%). Furthermore, in the KG an improvement in the COPV from pre to post-camp was observed in conditions of EO [-37.92% (p<0.001)], EC [-32.52% (p<0.001)], EOL [-29.11% (p<0.001)], EOR [-21.49% (p<0.001)]. In summary, one-week of high intensity karate training induced a significant improvement in static body balance in preadolescent karate athletes. Karate performance requires high-levels of both static and dynamic balance. Further research dealing with the effect of karate practice on dynamic body balance in young athletes is required.Entities:
Keywords: centre of pressure; karate training; physical exercise; postural sway; proprioception; training and testing
Year: 2013 PMID: 24235983 PMCID: PMC3827750 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2013-0044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Comparison of data (mean±SD) recorded at the pre and post-test between the two groups
| Group | Variable | Pre | Post | (Diff. %) | Group Interaction | Inter. × Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COP Length (mm) | F | p | η2 | F | p | η2 | ||||
| KG | EO | 43.42 ± 19.80 | 27.24 ± 8.38 | −37.26[ | 27.878 | 0.001 | 0.279 | 5.789 | 0.019 | 0.074 |
| CG | 43.73 ± 19.55 | 45.12 ± 19.90 | 3.16 | |||||||
| COP Velocity (mm·s−1) | ||||||||||
| KG | 4.40 ± 2.00 | 2.73 ± 0.85 | −37.92[ | 25.862 | 0.001 | 0.264 | 5.640 | 0.02 | 0.072 | |
| CG | 4.43 ± 2.11 | 4.51 ± 2.02 | 1.79 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| COP Length (mm) | ||||||||||
| KG | EC | 43.39 ± 19.51 | 29.63 ± 9.45 | −31.72[ | 19.412 | 0.001 | 0.215 | 4.100 | 0.05 | 0.055 |
| CG | 43.97 ± 19.66 | 44.38 ± 19.82 | 0.93 | |||||||
| COP Velocity (mm·s−1) | ||||||||||
| KG | 4.44 ± 1.94 | 2.99 ± 0.97 | −32.52[ | 20.707 | 0.001 | 0.223 | 5.036 | 0.028 | 0.065 | |
| CG | 4.46 ± 1.68 | 4.71 ± 2.30 | 5.73 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| COP Length (mm) | ||||||||||
| KG | EOL | 89.04 ± 33.20 | 64.76 ± 20.22 | −27.27[ | 12.975 | 0.001 | 0.158 | 3.414 | 0.069 | 0.047 |
| CG | 89.73 ± 34.29 | 87.01 ± 29.49 | −3.03 | |||||||
| COP Velocity (mm·s−1) | ||||||||||
| KG | 9.19 ± 3.61 | 6.51 ± 1.99 | −29.11[ | 10.554 | 0.001 | 0.128 | 3.250 | 0.076 | 0.043 | |
| CG | 9.17 ± 3.45 | 8.74 ± 2.96 | −4.72 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| COP Length (mm) | ||||||||||
| KG | EOR | 88.07 ± 30.54 | 69.19 ± 26.07 | −21.44[ | 6.691 | 0.012 | 0.086 | 1.813 | 0.182 | 0.025 |
| CG | 87.14 ± 31.64 | 86.30 ± 36.28 | −0.97 | |||||||
| COP Velocity (mm·s−1) | ||||||||||
| KG | 8.80 ± 3.07 | 6.91 ± 2.60 | −21.49[ | 5.672 | 0.02 | 0.073 | 1.876 | 0.175 | 0.025 | |
| CG | 8.78 ± 3.11 | 8.56 ± 3.59 | −2.57 | |||||||
Values are expressed as mean ± SD for Karate Group (KG) and Control Group (CG). The variables: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), eyes open one leg left (EOL), eyes open one leg right (EOR) was represented between pre and post training with
p < 0.001 versus baseline conditions with group and time interaction