Johnny Padulo1, Helmi Chaabène2, Montassar Tabben3, Monoem Haddad4, Cecilia Gevat5, Stefano Vando6, Lucio Maurino7, Anis Chaouachi8, Karim Chamari9. 1. Sport Science, University e-Campus, Novedrate, Italy ; Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia. 2. Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia ; ISSEP Ksar-Saïd, Manouba University, Tunisia. 3. CETAPS, Rouen University, Rouen, France. 4. Sport Science Program, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. 5. Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania. 6. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of "Tor Vergata" Rome, Italy. 7. Italian Federation Martial Art, Rome, Italy. 8. Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia. 9. Tunisian Research Laboratory "Sports Performance Optimization" National Center of Medicine and Science in Sport, Tunis, Tunisia ; Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre, ASPETAR, Qatar; Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method and two objective HR-based methods for quantifying karate's training load (TL) in young Karatekas. METHODS: eleven athletes (age 12.50±1.84 years) participated in this study. The training period/camp was performed on 5 consecutive days with two training session (s) per-day (d). Construct validity of RPE method in young Karate athletes, was studied by correlation analysis between RPE session's training load and both Edwards and Banister's training impulse score' method. RESULTS: significant relationship was found between inter-day (n-11 × d-5 × s-2 = 110) sessions RPE and Edwards (r values from 0.84 to 0.92 p < 0.001) and Banister's (r values from 0.84 to 0.97 p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: this study showed that session-RPE can be considered a valid method for quantifying karate's training load in young karate athletes.
BACKGROUND: the aim of this study was to assess the validity of the session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) method and two objective HR-based methods for quantifying karate's training load (TL) in young Karatekas. METHODS: eleven athletes (age 12.50±1.84 years) participated in this study. The training period/camp was performed on 5 consecutive days with two training session (s) per-day (d). Construct validity of RPE method in young Karate athletes, was studied by correlation analysis between RPE session's training load and both Edwards and Banister's training impulse score' method. RESULTS: significant relationship was found between inter-day (n-11 × d-5 × s-2 = 110) sessions RPE and Edwards (r values from 0.84 to 0.92 p < 0.001) and Banister's (r values from 0.84 to 0.97 p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: this study showed that session-RPE can be considered a valid method for quantifying karate's training load in young karate athletes.
Authors: Gianluca Vernillo; Luca Agnello; Andrew Drake; Johnny Padulo; Maria F Piacentini; Antonio La Torre Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Andrew J Galpin; James R Bagley; Blake Whitcomb; Leonard D Wiersma; Jakob Rosengarten; Jared W Coburn; Daniel A Judelson Journal: Sports (Basel) Date: 2016-06-29
Authors: Joseph W Shaw; Matthew Springham; Derrick D Brown; Adam M Mattiussi; Charles R Pedlar; Jamie Tallent Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 4.566