Literature DB >> 24234736

Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.

Ai Kawaguchi, Yuta Matsunaga, Tomoko Otsuka, Shoichi Suzuki.   

Abstract

Our aim in this study was to investigate the incident air kerma (IAK) and average glandular dose (AGD) for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantoms and patient breasts for each thickness by use of digital mammography units, and to determine the correlation between phantom and patient measurements. An additional aim was to calculate the numerical value of the diagnostic reference level (DRL) for digital mammography in Japan based on the AGD from patient measurements. Patient-based IAK and AGD values were calculated for 300 patients who underwent mammographic examinations at three institutions. On examination of a 40-mm PMMA phantom, the IAK and the AGD were 7.89 and 1.84 mGy, respectively. The mean patient breast thickness was 37.6 mm, and the mean IAK and the AGD calculated from actual patient data for breast thicknesses between 40 mm and 50 mm were 8.91 and 2.08 mGy, respectively. Approximately 20 % of the 300 patients had IAK >10 mGy. The distributions of patient-based IAK and AGD values were higher than the IAK and AGD values for the PMMA phantom. The patient dose with use of the PMMA phantom can be underestimated. The DRL was calculated from patient-based AGDs of the regular breast thickness as 2.0 mGy in Japan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24234736     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0239-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  8 in total

1.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran.

Authors:  Hamed Alizadeh Riabi; Parinaz Mehnati; Asghar Mesbahi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  [Dose evaluation in mammography for Japanese breast thickness].

Authors:  Tomoko Otsuka; Shoichi Suzuki; Miki Ogura; Takayuki Igarashi
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2011

4.  A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.

Authors:  P Morán; M Chevalier; J I Ten; J M Fernández Soto; E Vañó
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.

Authors:  K C Young; A Burch; J M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.

Authors:  Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac; Snezana Beciric; Danijela Arandjic; Dusko Kosutic; Milojko Kovacevic
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.

Authors:  N Jamal; K-H Ng; D McLean
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium.

Authors:  K Smans; H Bosmans; M Xiao; A K Carton; G Marchal
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 0.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.