Literature DB >> 15730985

Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002.

K C Young1, A Burch, J M Oduko.   

Abstract

The mean glandular doses (MGD) to samples of women attending for mammographic screening are measured routinely at screening centres in the UK Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). This paper reviews a large representative sample of dose measurements collected during screening in the NHSBSP in 2001 and 2002 for 53 218 films, using 290 X-ray sets, for 16 505 women. The average MGD was 2.23 mGy per oblique film and 1.96 mGy per craniocaudal film; similar to those found previously in the NHSBSP for the years 1997 and 1998. Increasing use of sophisticated units with automatic beam quality selection has reduced the radiation dose received by large breasts, with only 2% of oblique mammograms having doses in excess of 5 mGy. The increasing use of large format film has also reduced the doses to this sub-group. However the total dose per woman has increased due to the introduction of two view screening at every visit. The MGD to the standard breast was found to vary from 0.76 mGy to 2.29 mGy, with 97% of units below the recommended upper limit of 2 mGy, illustrating the benefit of strict quality control. A reduction in dose of 3% was observed between the age bands 50-54 years and 60-64 years. This study has confirmed that the proposed national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) of 3.5 mGy for 55 mm thick breasts is an appropriate value to identify systems giving unusually high doses, with just 3.5% of systems exceeding this level. In most cases these higher doses were explained by the design of one particular make of X-ray set and its mode of operation. Average doses for oblique views of average sized breasts were fairly well correlated with the dose to the standard breast, and typically 42% higher. This highlights the need for a revised definition of the standard breast used in the UK to better reflect the exposure factors and doses received in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15730985     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/41095952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  Kenneth C Young; Jennifer M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  T Svahn; B Hemdal; M Ruschin; D P Chakraborty; I Andersson; A Tingberg; S Mattsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Kristina Bliznakova; Xulei Qin; Baowei Fei; Steve Si Jia Feng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Practical dosimetry methods for the determination of effective skin and breast dose for a modern CT system, incorporating partial irradiation and prospective cardiac gating.

Authors:  R J Loader; O Gosling; C Roobottom; G Morgan-Hughes; N Rowles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Clinical dose performance of full field digital mammography in a breast screening programme.

Authors:  J B McCullagh; P Baldelli; N Phelan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; David R Dance; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities.

Authors:  Dc Spelic; Rv Kaczmarek; M Hilohi; S Belella
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

10.  Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Tomoko Otsuka; Shoichi Suzuki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.