Literature DB >> 24234263

Back problems are for life: Perceived vulnerability and its implications for chronic disability.

V Tarasuk1, J M Eakin.   

Abstract

As part of a qualitative research study of the experience of work-related back problems, a series of in-depth ethnographic interviews were conducted with 15 workers receiving treatment for back injuries. Analysis of these data revealed that the workers perceived their back problems as lifelong problems. Many believed that their back injuries had permanently heightened their vulnerability to reinjury and chronic disability. Accommodating this sense of physical vulnerability required a redefinition of one's self and one's future. For some workers, the perceived threat of future back problems was itself disabling and appeared to discourage a return to normal social roles. Workers' interactions with the health care system shaped their perceptions of their bodies and their notions of the appropriate means to cope with their physical vulnerability. Implications of the perception of permanence for the development of chronic disability among workers who experience back problems are examined.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24234263     DOI: 10.1007/BF02109996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  17 in total

1.  Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction.

Authors:  A Steckler; K R McLeroy; R M Goodman; S T Bird; L McCormick
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D Cherkin; D Conrad; E Volinn
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Predictors of sciatic pain among concrete reinforcement workers and house painters--a five-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Riihimäki; G Wickström; K Hänninen; T Luopajärvi
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain.

Authors:  M N Goertz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries.

Authors:  R I Mitchell; G M Carmen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinical trial of common treatments for low back pain in family practice.

Authors:  J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; A Hildebrand; C Evans
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-21

8.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. II. Location, character, aggravating and relieving factors.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

9.  Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability.

Authors:  M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-03
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

2.  Obstacles to and facilitators of return to work after work-disabling back pain: the workers' perspective.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Eve Laperrière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-06

3.  Differences in predictors for return to work following musculoskeletal injury between workers with and without somatic comorbidities.

Authors:  Cécile R L Boot; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Ute Bültmann; Ben C Amick; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael V Mondloch; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Public perceptions about low back pain and its management: a gap between expectations and reality?

Authors:  Jennifer A. Klaber Moffett; Elizabeth Newbronner; Gordon Waddell; Karen Croucher; Steven Spear
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Exploring the distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following traumatic injury to Victorian workers.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Anna Devlin; Emily Kerr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.