Literature DB >> 23179742

Exploring the distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following traumatic injury to Victorian workers.

Fiona J Clay1, Anna Devlin, Emily Kerr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the frequency, distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following non-life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma to Victorian workers. It is proposed that interventions to modify recovery expectations may reduce the burden associated with injury. However, it is not known whether recovery expectations change over time or the factors that are associated with change.
METHODS: A prospective inception cohort study was carried out in which participants were recruited following presentation to hospital for treatment of their injury and followed for 6 months post-injury. Baseline data was obtained by survey and medical record review. Binary logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with a change in recovery expectations between week 2 and week 12 post-injury.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised injured workers (n = 145) who had sustained nonlife threatening acute orthopaedic trauma. Factors associated with an improvement in recovery expectations or recovery timeframe included more years of education and higher social functioning. Participants whose injury involved a perception of responsibility by a third party were 7.18 (95 % CI 1.86-27.68) times more likely to change their recovery expectations to more negative expectations and less likely to change to an earlier recovery timeframe. Participants with more severe injuries were more likely to change their recovery timeframe to a longer timeframe.
CONCLUSION: Change in recovery expectations provide some information on injured workers who may benefit from targeted interventions to improve or maintain recovery expectations. The post-injury time-point at which recovery expectations are measured is important if recovery expectations are to inform long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23179742     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9400-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  27 in total

1.  What influences positive return to work expectation? Examining associated factors in a population-based cohort of whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Dejan Ozegovic; Linda J Carroll; J David Cassidy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The brief illness perception questionnaire.

Authors:  Elizabeth Broadbent; Keith J Petrie; Jodie Main; John Weinman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Outcomes of patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to level 1 trauma centres.

Authors:  Donna M Urquhart; Owen D Williamson; Belinda J Gabbe; Flavia M Cicuttini; Peter A Cameron; Martin D Richardson; Elton R Edwards
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Test-retest reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kate V Grafton; Nadine E Foster; Christine C Wright
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Determinants of return to work following non life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Stuart V Newstead; Wendy L Watson; Roderick J McClure
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 6.  Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes.

Authors:  M V Mondloch; D C Cole; J W Frank
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael V Mondloch; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Mediators, moderators, and predictors of therapeutic change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain.

Authors:  Judith A Turner; Susan Holtzman; Lloyd Mancl
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Cognitive-behavioral approach to the treatment of chronic pain patients.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

10.  Educational achievement and chronic pain disability: mediating role of pain-related cognitions.

Authors:  Randy S Roth; Michael E Geisser
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Sullivan; Maria N Wilson; Douglas P Gross; Ole Kudsk Jensen; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Jill A Hayden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-12

2.  Do recovery expectations change over time?

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Alice Kongsted; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Lise Hestbaek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Elyssa Besen; Amanda E Young; William S Shaw
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.