Literature DB >> 2144916

Results of a multicenter trial using an intensive active exercise program for the treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries.

R I Mitchell1, G M Carmen.   

Abstract

Dissatisfaction with current nonsurgical treatment of acute soft tissue and back injuries initiated a search for more effective treatment. A multicenter trial, involving 12 clinics, treated 1,072 patients. Treatment consisted of intensive, time-limited exercises emphasizing mobility, muscle strengthening, work conditioning, sequence training, and appropriate education sessions. Return to full-time work was proof that the patient had recovered fully. Time off work and compensation costs were parameters used to evaluate results. A detailed study of 703 patients treated at five clinics, operational for more than 12 months, showed superior results when compared with the comparison group of 2,172 matched control subjects. The treatment group returned to work earlier and realized substantial cost savings. This treatment program has proved to be superior to the miscellaneous variety of treatment modalities used for acute soft tissue and back injuries provided to the comparison group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2144916     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199006000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Low back pain and physical exercise in leisure time in 38-year-old men and women: a 25-year prospective cohort study of 640 school children.

Authors:  M Harreby; G Hesselsøe; J Kjer; K Neergaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain.

Authors:  A Keller; J Hayden; C Bombardier; M van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Should backache be treated with spinal fusion? The case for spinal fusion is unproved.

Authors:  J Wilson-MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

6.  Low back pain in the workplace: attainable benefits not attained.

Authors:  W O Spitzer
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-05

7.  The probability of recovery and return to work from work disability as a function of time.

Authors:  J Crook; H Moldofsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Chronic back pain and work disability: Vocational outcomes following multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; L Menz; T Zastowny; B A Barron
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-12

10.  Back problems are for life: Perceived vulnerability and its implications for chronic disability.

Authors:  V Tarasuk; J M Eakin
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.