Literature DB >> 24222354

Cancer-Associated Perturbations in Alternative Pre-messenger RNA Splicing.

Lulzim Shkreta1, Brendan Bell, Timothée Revil, Julian P Venables, Panagiotis Prinos, Sherif Abou Elela, Benoit Chabot.   

Abstract

For most of our 25,000 genes, the removal of introns by pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing represents an essential step toward the production of functional messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Alternative splicing of a single pre-mRNA results in the production of different mRNAs. Although complex organisms use alternative splicing to expand protein function and phenotypic diversity, patterns of alternative splicing are often altered in cancer cells. Alternative splicing contributes to tumorigenesis by producing splice isoforms that can stimulate cell proliferation and cell migration or induce resistance to apoptosis and anticancer agents. Cancer-specific changes in splicing profiles can occur through mutations that are affecting splice sites and splicing control elements, and also by alterations in the expression of proteins that control splicing decisions. Recent progress in global approaches that interrogate splicing diversity should help to obtain specific splicing signatures for cancer types. The development of innovative approaches for annotating and reprogramming splicing events will more fully establish the essential contribution of alternative splicing to the biology of cancer and will hopefully provide novel targets and anticancer strategies. Metazoan genes are usually made up of several exons interrupted by introns. The introns are removed from the pre-mRNA by RNA splicing. In conjunction with other maturation steps, such as capping and polyadenylation, the spliced mRNA is then transported to the cytoplasm to be translated into a functional protein. The basic mechanism of splicing requires accurate recognition of each extremity of each intron by the spliceosome. Introns are identified by the binding of U1 snRNP to the 5' splice site and the U2AF65/U2AF35 complex to the 3' splice site. Following these interactions, other proteins and snRNPs are recruited to generate the complete spliceosomal complex needed to excise the intron. While many introns are constitutively removed by the spliceosome, other splice junctions are not used systematically, generating the phenomenon of alternative splicing. Alternative splicing is therefore the process by which a single species of pre-mRNA can be matured to produce different mRNA molecules (Fig. 1). Depending on the number and types of alternative splicing events, a pre-mRNA can generate from two to several thousands different mRNAs leading to the production of a corresponding number of proteins. It is now believed that the expression of at least 70 % of human genes is subjected to alternative splicing, implying an enormous contribution to proteomic diversity, and by extension, to the development and the evolution of complex animals. Defects in splicing have been associated with human diseases (Caceres and Kornblihtt, Trends Genet 18(4):186-93, 2002, Cartegni et al., Nat Rev Genet 3(4):285-98, 2002, Pagani and Baralle, Nat Rev Genet 5(5):389-96, 2004), including cancer (Brinkman, Clin Biochem 37(7):584-94, 2004, Venables, Bioessays 28(4):378-86, 2006, Srebrow and Kornblihtt, J Cell Sci 119(Pt 13):2635-2641, 2006, Revil et al., Bull Cancer 93(9):909-919, 2006, Venables, Transworld Res Network, 2006, Pajares et al., Lancet Oncol 8(4):349-57, 2007, Skotheim and Nees, Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39:1432-1449, 2007). Numerous studies have now confirmed the existence of specific differences in the alternative splicing profiles between normal and cancer tissues. Although there are a few cases where specific mutations are the primary cause for these changes, global alterations in alternative splicing in cancer cells may be primarily derived from changes in the expression of RNA-binding proteins that control splice site selection. Overall, these cancer-specific differences in alternative splicing offer an immense potential to improve the diagnosis and the prognosis of cancer. This review will focus on the functional impact of cancer-associated alternative splicing variants, the molecular determinants that alter the splicing decisions in cancer cells, and future therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222354     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31659-3_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Res        ISSN: 0927-3042


  23 in total

1.  Neuronal SH-SY5Y cells use the C-dystrophin promoter coupled with exon 78 skipping and display multiple patterns of alternative splicing including two intronic insertion events.

Authors:  Atsushi Nishida; Maki Minegishi; Atsuko Takeuchi; Hiroyuki Awano; Emma Tabe Eko Niba; Masafumi Matsuo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Mechanism of alternative splicing and its regulation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Jing Liu; B O Huang; Yan-Mei Xu; Jing Li; Lin-Feng Huang; Jin Lin; Jing Zhang; Qing-Hua Min; Wei-Ming Yang; Xiao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-12-17

3.  UXT-AS1-induced alternative splicing of UXT is associated with tumor progression in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Wei Luo; Xiang Zeng; Lisi Zeng; Zhiyang Li; Xiaofang Deng; Xiaojun Tan; Weimin Hu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Quantitative profiling of the UGT transcriptome in human drug-metabolizing tissues.

Authors:  A Tourancheau; M Rouleau; S Guauque-Olarte; L Villeneuve; I Gilbert; A Droit; C Guillemette
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 5.  Pathological unfoldomics of uncontrolled chaos: intrinsically disordered proteins and human diseases.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky; Vrushank Davé; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Prerna Malaney; Steven J Metallo; Ravi Ramesh Pathak; Andreas C Joerger
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  The splicing factor RBM4 controls apoptosis, proliferation, and migration to suppress tumor progression.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Dan Chen; Haili Qian; Yihsuan S Tsai; Shujuan Shao; Quentin Liu; Daniel Dominguez; Zefeng Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  JUM is a computational method for comprehensive annotation-free analysis of alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns.

Authors:  Qingqing Wang; Donald C Rio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phosphoproteomic analysis of the highly-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, MHCC97-H.

Authors:  Miaomiao Tian; Han Cheng; Zhiqiang Wang; Na Su; Zexian Liu; Changqing Sun; Bei Zhen; Xuechuan Hong; Yu Xue; Ping Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Potential Gene Interactions in the Cell Cycles of Gametes, Zygotes, Embryonic Stem Cells and the Development of Cancer.

Authors:  Gregor Prindull
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Role of the splicing factor SRSF4 in cisplatin-induced modifications of pre-mRNA splicing and apoptosis.

Authors:  Maude Gabriel; Yves Delforge; Adeline Deward; Yvette Habraken; Benoit Hennuy; Jacques Piette; Roscoe Klinck; Benoit Chabot; Alain Colige; Charles Lambert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.