Literature DB >> 30104386

JUM is a computational method for comprehensive annotation-free analysis of alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns.

Qingqing Wang1,2,3, Donald C Rio4,2,3.   

Abstract

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing (AS) greatly diversifies metazoan transcriptomes and proteomes and is crucial for gene regulation. Current computational analysis methods of AS from Illumina RNA-sequencing data rely on preannotated libraries of known spliced transcripts, which hinders AS analysis with poorly annotated genomes and can further mask unknown AS patterns. To address this critical bioinformatics problem, we developed a method called the junction usage model (JUM) that uses a bottom-up approach to identify, analyze, and quantitate global AS profiles without any prior transcriptome annotations. JUM accurately reports global AS changes in terms of the five conventional AS patterns and an additional "composite" category composed of inseparable combinations of conventional patterns. JUM stringently classifies the difficult and disease-relevant pattern of intron retention (IR), reducing the false positive rate of IR detection commonly seen in other annotation-based methods to near-negligible rates. When analyzing AS in RNA samples derived from Drosophila heads, human tumors, and human cell lines bearing cancer-associated splicing factor mutations, JUM consistently identified approximately twice the number of novel AS events missed by other methods. Computational simulations showed JUM exhibits a 1.2 to 4.8 times higher true positive rate at a fixed cutoff of 5% false discovery rate. In summary, JUM provides a framework and improved method that removes the necessity for transcriptome annotations and enables the detection, analysis, and quantification of AS patterns in complex metazoan transcriptomes with superior accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-seq; alternative pre-mRNA splicing; annotation-free

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104386      PMCID: PMC6126775          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806018115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  53 in total

1.  rMATS: robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data.

Authors:  Shihao Shen; Juw Won Park; Zhi-xiang Lu; Lan Lin; Michael D Henry; Ying Nian Wu; Qing Zhou; Yi Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Systematic discovery of regulated and conserved alternative exons in the mammalian brain reveals NMD modulating chromatin regulators.

Authors:  Qinghong Yan; Sebastien M Weyn-Vanhentenryck; Jie Wu; Steven A Sloan; Ye Zhang; Kenian Chen; Jia Qian Wu; Ben A Barres; Chaolin Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  SOAPdenovo-Trans: de novo transcriptome assembly with short RNA-Seq reads.

Authors:  Yinlong Xie; Gengxiong Wu; Jingbo Tang; Ruibang Luo; Jordan Patterson; Shanlin Liu; Weihua Huang; Guangzhu He; Shengchang Gu; Shengkang Li; Xin Zhou; Tak-Wah Lam; Yingrui Li; Xun Xu; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Jun Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  SMN deficiency in severe models of spinal muscular atrophy causes widespread intron retention and DNA damage.

Authors:  Mohini Jangi; Christina Fleet; Patrick Cullen; Shipra V Gupta; Shila Mekhoubad; Eric Chiao; Norm Allaire; C Frank Bennett; Frank Rigo; Adrian R Krainer; Jessica A Hurt; John P Carulli; John F Staropoli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Disease-associated mutation in SRSF2 misregulates splicing by altering RNA-binding affinities.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Yen K Lieu; Abdullah M Ali; Alex Penson; Kathryn S Reggio; Raul Rabadan; Azra Raza; Siddhartha Mukherjee; James L Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The PSI-U1 snRNP interaction regulates male mating behavior in Drosophila.

Authors:  Qingqing Wang; J Matthew Taliaferro; Ugne Klibaite; Valérie Hilgers; Joshua W Shaevitz; Donald C Rio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Annotation-free quantification of RNA splicing using LeafCutter.

Authors:  Yang I Li; David A Knowles; Jack Humphrey; Alvaro N Barbeira; Scott P Dickinson; Hae Kyung Im; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  IRFinder: assessing the impact of intron retention on mammalian gene expression.

Authors:  Robert Middleton; Dadi Gao; Aubin Thomas; Babita Singh; Amy Au; Justin J-L Wong; Alexandra Bomane; Bertrand Cosson; Eduardo Eyras; John E J Rasko; William Ritchie
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  An atlas of alternative splicing profiles and functional associations reveals new regulatory programs and genes that simultaneously express multiple major isoforms.

Authors:  Javier Tapial; Kevin C H Ha; Timothy Sterne-Weiler; André Gohr; Ulrich Braunschweig; Antonio Hermoso-Pulido; Mathieu Quesnel-Vallières; Jon Permanyer; Reza Sodaei; Yamile Marquez; Luca Cozzuto; Xinchen Wang; Melisa Gómez-Velázquez; Teresa Rayon; Miguel Manzanares; Julia Ponomarenko; Benjamin J Blencowe; Manuel Irimia
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  A new view of transcriptome complexity and regulation through the lens of local splicing variations.

Authors:  Jorge Vaquero-Garcia; Alejandro Barrera; Matthew R Gazzara; Juan González-Vallinas; Nicholas F Lahens; John B Hogenesch; Kristen W Lynch; Yoseph Barash
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Altered RNA Processing in Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Authors:  Esther A Obeng; Connor Stewart; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  SCANVIS: a tool for SCoring, ANnotating and VISualizing splice junctions.

Authors:  Phaedra Agius; Heather Geiger; Nicolas Robine
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Degradation of splicing factor SRSF3 contributes to progressive liver disease.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Manasi Das; Consuelo Sauceda; Lesley G Ellies; Karina Kuo; Purva Parwal; Mehak Kaur; Lily Jih; Gautam K Bandyopadhyay; Douglas Burton; Rohit Loomba; Olivia Osborn; Nicholas Jg Webster
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Coupling of spliceosome complexity to intron diversity.

Authors:  Jade Sales-Lee; Daniela S Perry; Bradley A Bowser; Jolene K Diedrich; Beiduo Rao; Irene Beusch; John R Yates; Scott W Roy; Hiten D Madhani
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Computing the Role of Alternative Splicing in Cancer.

Authors:  Zhaoqi Liu; Raul Rabadan
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2021-01-23

6.  Tracking pre-mRNA maturation across subcellular compartments identifies developmental gene regulation through intron retention and nuclear anchoring.

Authors:  Kyu-Hyeon Yeom; Zhicheng Pan; Chia-Ho Lin; Han Young Lim; Wen Xiao; Yi Xing; Douglas L Black
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  SUVA: splicing site usage variation analysis from RNA-seq data reveals highly conserved complex splicing biomarkers in liver cancer.

Authors:  Chao Cheng; Lei Liu; Yongli Bao; Jingwen Yi; Weili Quan; Yaqiang Xue; Luguo Sun; Yi Zhang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.766

8.  PSI-Sigma: a comprehensive splicing-detection method for short-read and long-read RNA-seq analysis.

Authors:  Kuan-Ting Lin; Adrian R Krainer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.931

Review 9.  Alternative splicing and cancer: insights, opportunities, and challenges from an expanding view of the transcriptome.

Authors:  Sara Cherry; Kristen W Lynch
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Genetic effects on promoter usage are highly context-specific and contribute to complex traits.

Authors:  Kaur Alasoo; Julia Rodrigues; John Danesh; Daniel F Freitag; Dirk S Paul; Daniel J Gaffney
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.