Literature DB >> 24221917

X-Ray assessment of the effect of pedicle screw on vertebra and spinal canal growth in children before the age of 7 years.

Xuhong Xue1, Jianxiong Shen, Jianguo Zhang, Shugang Li, Yipeng Wang, Guixing Qiu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the reliability of pedicle screws placed in children younger than 7 years of age, and to evaluate the effect of pedicle screw insertion on further growth of the vertebra and spinal canal.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 35 consecutive patients through Jan 2003-Dec 2010 for congenital scoliosis in <7 years children was performed at one spine center. Patients undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation of at least two levels, which had been followed-up for at least 24 months were included. Measurements were performed in instrumented and adjacent non-instrumented levels. The effect of pedicle screw insertion on further growth was evaluated.
RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 4.4 year (53 months, range, 23-84 months). 190 segments in 35 patients met the inclusion criteria. 77 segments had no screws and 113 had at least one screw. There was a significant difference between the pre-operative and final follow-up values of the measurement of spinal canal and vertebral body parameters (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed between growth rates of vertebral bodies and the sagittal diameters of spinal canal with or without screws. The growth rates of vertebral bodies in lumbar spine were higher than in thoracic spine in both instrumented and adjacent groups.
CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw instrumentation does not cause a retardation effect on the development of vertebral bodies and the spinal canal in children at an early age. It is a safe and reliable procedure to achieve a stable fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24221917      PMCID: PMC3940793          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3035-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

Review 1.  Growth in pediatric orthopaedics.

Authors:  A Dimeglio
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  MRI characteristics of the neurocentral synchondrosis.

Authors:  T Rajwani; R Bhargava; M Moreau; J Mahood; V J Raso; H Jiang; K M Bagnall
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-07-18

3.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; U Lepsien; L Hackenberg; T Niemeyer; H Halm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws in patients with and without coronal plane spinal deformities.

Authors:  Philip J Belmont; William R Klemme; Mark Robinson; David W Polly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Ronald A Lehman; David W Polly; Timothy R Kuklo; Bryan Cunningham; Kevin L Kirk; Philip J Belmont
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The components of the magnetic resonance image of the neurocentral junction.

Authors:  T Rajwani; E M Hilang; C Secretan; R Bhargava; R Lambert; M Moreau; J Mahood; V J Raso; K M Bagnall
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

7.  The vertebral canal: I. Nutrition and development, an archaeological study.

Authors:  R W Porter; D Pavitt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Pedicle screws in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth.

Authors:  Michael Ruf; Jürgen Harms
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg; T Link; H Halm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe?

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Yongsun S Cho; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?" (by Da-Geng Huang, Si-Min He, Jun-Wei Pan, et al. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(5):1109-1114).

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Luca P Ardigò
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does addition of crosslink to pedicle-screw-based instrumentation impact the development of the spinal canal in children younger than 5 years of age?

Authors:  Zhong-hui Chen; Xi Chen; Ze-zhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Bang-ping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Growth modulation and remodeling by means of posterior tethering technique for correction of early-onset scoliosis with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Authors:  Alaaeldin A Ahmad; Loai Aker; Yahia Hanbali; Aesha Sbaih; Zaher Nazzal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does pedicle screw fixation under age 5 cause spinal canal narrowing? A CT study with minimum 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Sinan Kahraman; Selhan Karadereler; Mutlu Cobanoglu; Sinan Yilar; Ayhan Mutlu; Levent Onur Ulusoy; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior hemivertebra resection with unilateral instrumented fusion in children less than 10 years old: preliminary results at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Xuhong Xue; Sheng Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.