Literature DB >> 14501914

Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.

Ronald A Lehman1, David W Polly, Timothy R Kuklo, Bryan Cunningham, Kevin L Kirk, Philip J Belmont.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study on cadaveric thoracic vertebrae using pullout strength, insertional torque, and bone mineral density to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of thoracic pedicle screws.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a biomechanical study on cadaveric thoracic vertebrae using insertional torque, pullout strength, and bone mineral density to determine the optimal biomechanical sagittal trajectory for placement thoracic pedicle screws. We compared the straight-forward (paralleling the vertebral endplate) with anatomic trajectory (directed along the true anatomic axis of the pedicle).
METHODS: Thirty cadaveric thoracic vertebrae were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched, fixed-head pedicle screws were then randomly assigned by side and placed using the straight-forward or anatomic technique under fluoroscopic visualization while recording the maximum insertional torque. Pullout strength testing was then performed.
RESULTS: The maximum insertional torque for the straight-forward technique was 2.58 +/- 0.14 (SE) in pounds, whereas the anatomic technique averaged 1.86 +/- 0.14 (SE) in pounds (P = 0.0005). The maximum insertional torque at the neurocentral junction for the straight-forward technique averaged 1.89 +/- 0.17 (SE) in-lbs. (73% of maximum insertional torque), whereas the anatomic trajectory averaged 1.39 +/- 0.11 (SE) in pounds (75% of maximum insertional torque) (P = 0.007). The average pullout strength using a straight-forward trajectory was 611 +/- 50 (SE) N compared to the anatomic trajectory, which averaged 481 +/- 54 (SE) N (P = 0.034). The pullout strength correlated with mean bone mineral density for both the straight-forward (r = 0.461, P = 0.027) and anatomic (r = 0.598, P = 0.004) techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: The straight-forward technique results in a 39% increase in maximum insertional torque and a 27% increase in pullout strength compared to the anatomic technique. The maximum insertional torque at the neurocentral junction resulted in a 36% increase using the straight-forward technique versus the anatomic trajectory. Bone mineral density directly correlates with pullout strength for both techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501914     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000087743.57439.4F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

2.  Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  M Robitaille; C E Aubin; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Financial analysis of circumferential fusion versus posterior-only with thoracic pedicle screw constructs for main thoracic idiopathic curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees.

Authors:  Scott J Luhmann; Lawrence G Lenke; Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Takigawa Tomoyuki; Ashish Jain; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature.

Authors:  F Perna; R Borghi; F Pilla; N Stefanini; A Mazzotti; M Chehrassan
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-19

7.  Placement of Thoracic Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  David W Polly; Alexandra K Yaszemski; Kristen E Jones
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2016-03-09

Review 8.  Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Varun Puvanesarajah; Jason A Liauw; Sheng-Fu Lo; Ioan A Lina; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18

9.  Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis - The easy bone conserving way.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Lalit Kumar; Ramesh Kumar; Tankeshwar Boruah; Pankaj Kumar Jindal; Vinod Kumar Sabharwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03-06

10.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.