Literature DB >> 11383294

Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine.

U Liljenqvist1, L Hackenberg, T Link, H Halm.   

Abstract

While the biomechanical properties of pedicle screws have proven to be superior in the lumbar spine, little is known concerning pullout strength of pedicle screws in comparison to hooks in the thoracic spine. In vitro biomechanical pullout testing was performed to evaluate the axial pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine with regard to surgical correction techniques in scoliosis. Nine human cadaveric thoracic spines were harvested and disarticulated. To simulate a typical posterior segmental scoliosis instrumentation, standard pedicle hooks were used between T4 and T8 and supralaminar hooks between T9 and T12 and tested against pedicle screws. The pedicle screws were loaded strictly longitudinal to their axis; the hooks were loaded perpendicular to the intended rod direction. In total, 90 pullout tests were performed. Average pullout strength of the pedicle screws was significantly higher than in the hook group (T4-T8: 531 N versus 321 N, T9-T12: 807 N versus 600 N, p < 0.05). Both screw diameter and the bone mineral density (BMD) had significant influence on the pullout strength in the screw group. For scoliosis correction, pedicle screws might be beneficial, especially for rigid thoracic curves, since they are significantly more resistant to axial pullout than both pedicle and laminar hooks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11383294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  42 in total

1.  [Intraoperative three-dimensional navigation for pedicle screw placement].

Authors:  P A Grützner; T Beutler; K Wendl; J von Recum; A Wentzensen; L-P Nolte
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Biomechanical study of anterior spinal instrumentation configurations.

Authors:  Luc P Cloutier; Carl-Eric Aubin; Guy Grimard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.

Authors:  Wilbert van Laar; Rinse J Meester; Theo H Smit; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique.

Authors:  Kook Jin Chung; Seung Woo Suh; Sameer Desai; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Pedicle screw instrumentation and spinal deformities: have we gone too far?

Authors:  John McCormick; Max Aebi; David Toby; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Multiplan correction of a 3D deformity. Options and relevance of optimizing the thoracic kyphosis in reconstructive scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; C H Fürstenberg; K Schröder; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  [Posterior operative correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Value of pedicle screws versus hooks].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; C Schmidt; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Riesner; Thomas R Blattert; Renate Krezdorn; Simone Schädler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Free-hand thoracic pedicle screws placed by neurosurgery residents: a CT analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Y Wang; Cynthia T Chin; Daniel C Lu; Justin S Smith; Dean Chou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.