Literature DB >> 24220606

In-vivo dark-field and phase-contrast x-ray imaging.

M Bech1, A Tapfer, A Velroyen, A Yaroshenko, B Pauwels, J Hostens, P Bruyndonckx, A Sasov, F Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

Novel radiography approaches based on the wave nature of x-rays when propagating through matter have a great potential for improved future x-ray diagnostics in the clinics. Here, we present a significant milestone in this imaging method: in-vivo multi-contrast x-ray imaging of a mouse using a compact scanner. Of particular interest is the enhanced contrast in regions related to the respiratory system, indicating a possible application in diagnosis of lung diseases (e.g. emphysema).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24220606      PMCID: PMC3826096          DOI: 10.1038/srep03209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Phase-contrast radiography approaches based on the wave-like behavior of x-rays in matter provide complementary image information to the conventional x-ray image, opening for the possibility to significantly impact x-ray diagnostics in the clinics. Of the different approaches to obtain such new images, a recently developed technique, based on micro-structured x-ray transmission gratings, appears particularly promising; it works not only with large-scale synchrotron facilities, but also with conventional x-ray tube sources1234. Several groups worldwide are presently making an effort to translate such multi-contrast x-ray imaging from bench to bedside56789. Though several technical challenges still need to be overcome before clinical implementation is possible (such as increased mechanical stability and fabrication of large-area, high-quality wave-optical x-ray gratings), the first step in this direction is the development of a small-animal prototype scanner where the ‘patient’ lies on a bed. At this stage, more basic questions about the medical relevance of the new imaging modalities can be addressed. Currently, efforts are undertaken to evaluate for which radiological application the method will provide the largest additional diagnostic value, and studies of lung disease development in living animals are in progress. Previously published ex-vivo data includes two studies with a grating interferometer using a laser-driven x-ray source: A proof-of-principle emphysema diagnosis10, and a receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of each image channel in differentiating between healthy and emphysematous lung tissue11. Further, the method has recently been translated to proof-of-principle imaging with the compact scanner also used in the current study12.

Results

Here, we present a set of complementary x-ray images successfully acquired of a living mouse. These results were obtained with a multi-contrast x-ray small-animal imaging scanner, which we have recently developed and commissioned1314. Figure 1 displays the three components of the multi-contrast x-ray image acquired. The three images in Figure 1 are acquired simultaneously, and show two new imaging signals – the differential phase-contrast radiograph, based on refraction (Fig. 1b), and the dark-field contrast radiograph, based on scattering (Fig. 1c) – alongside with the conventional x-ray image, based on attenuation (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1

First in-vivo multi-contrast x-ray images of a mouse.

(a) Conventional x-ray image based on attenuation. (b) Differential phase-contrast image based on x-ray refraction. (c) Dark-field image based on x-ray scattering. All three images are intrinsically perfectly registered as they are extracted from the same data recorded with a grating interferometer. Examples of regions of enhanced contrast are marked with arrows, showing the refraction of the trachea (b) and the scattering of the lungs (c). The white bars correspond to 1 cm.

The multi-contrast image is formed by exploiting the wave nature of x-rays. Whether the x-ray photons are absorbed, coherently refracted or scattered, the interaction can be used to form an image. To extract this information, three x-ray transmission gratings are located in the x-ray beam path: one behind the source, one behind the specimen and one right in front of the detector. Together they form an interferometer, producing an interference pattern, which is analyzed to retrieve the multi-contrast x-ray image with three different contrast channels. A schematic view of the experiment is displayed in the Supplementary Figure 1. Inherently, the three contrast channels have the same resolution, and they are perfectly registered pixel by pixel. In the imaging process, a so-called phase-stepping scan is performed, by acquiring five exposures with slightly different relative positions of the interferometer gratings3. Subsequently the three image modalities are extracted from the recorded frames by fast Fourier computer processing. Finally, the resulting images are normalized and any residual phase ramp is removed from the differential phase image14. As illustrated, the information gained from each of the three contrast modalities is of complementary nature. The conventional x-ray image (Fig. 1a) shows very good contrast between bones and soft tissue, mainly due to the increased x-ray attenuation of calcium compared to the lighter organic elements. The differential phase-contrast image (Fig. 1b) enhances details in the soft tissue1. In particular the interfaces of air filled regions are clearly shown, such as the trachea (marked by an arrow) or the lungs. For the sake of direct comparison and to highlight the complementary information encoded in those two signals, the differential phase-contrast image is displayed side-by-side with the differential attenuation image in Supplementary Figure 2 online. Finally, The dark-field image (Fig. 1c) enhances features containing sub-pixel-sized micro-structures because of ultra small-angle x-ray scattering3151617. Particularly the lungs exhibit a strong signal, as their main morphological structures – the alveoli – have a typical size of a few ten micrometers10.

Discussion

Although the mouse used for this demonstration does not carry any diseases, it is evident from the radiographs (Fig. 1), that multi-contrast x-ray imaging offers a great potential for added value in clinical x-ray diagnostics. Moreover, the results demonstrate that even though some blurring occurs due to heart beat and breathing cycles (as is also the case in conventional x-ray and tomography images of small animals), this motion does not lead to a break-down of the phase- or dark-field contrast images in-vivo, as is currently controversially discussed in the scientific community. In summary, the images we have presented are the result of a dedicated effort in the development of a compact scanner for phase-contrast and dark-field x-ray imaging of small animals in a standard laboratory. This marks a milestone towards multi-contrast x-ray radiography in a pre-clinical setting. The first in-vivo results on small rodents particularly highlight improved contrast in regions related to the respiratory system, making application in diagnosis of lung diseases (e.g. emphysema) possible. Future work will focus on evaluating the added clinical benefit for several small animal disease models (including spontaneous cancer models of different organs), also employing computed tomography.

Methods

The images were recorded with a Talbot-Lau x-ray interferometer1 with three gratings: Source grating and analyzer grating have gold structures approximately 35 μm deep, with grating pitch of 10.0 μm and 4.8 μm respectively. The phase grating has 4.0 μm deep nickel structures with a pitch of 3.24 μm. All gratings structures have a duty cycle of 0.5. The x-ray source is a 50 Watt tungsten tube (RTW, MCBM 65B) with a 50 μm focal spot size, and the detector is a Hamamatsu flat panel (C9312SK-06). The x-ray tube was operated at 31 kV peak voltage and 500 μA current during the experiment. The interferometer (total length approximately 470 mm) is mounted in a gantry allowing a vertical beam path through the mouse specimen lying on the sample bed. Five images were acquired with a 10 seconds exposure each, giving a total dose of 3.9 mGy to the animal. The raw images were Fourier processed and ramp corrected to obtain the three image modalities. Finally two regions of interest were stitched together, giving the result presented in Fig. 1. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for animal studies of the University of Antwerp.

Author Contributions

F.P. and A.S. initiated and coordinated the project. F.P., M.B., B.P., P.B. and A.S. conceived the grating interferometer and scanner hardware. A.T., A.V., A.Y., B.P. and M.B. commissioned the scanner. A.V., A.Y., B.P. and J.H. performed the experiment. M.B. treated the data and wrote the manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
  15 in total

1.  Development of a prototype gantry system for preclinical x-ray phase-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Arne Tapfer; Martin Bech; Bart Pauwels; Xuan Liu; Peter Bruyndonckx; Alexander Sasov; Johannes Kenntner; Jurgen Mohr; Marco Walter; Joachim Schulz; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry.

Authors:  W Yashiro; Y Terui; K Kawabata; A Momose
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Small-angle scattering computed tomography (SAS-CT) using a Talbot-Lau interferometerand a rotating anode x-ray tube:theory and experiments.

Authors:  Guang-Hong Chen; Nicholas Bevins; Joseph Zambelli; Zhihua Qi
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  A grating-based single-shot x-ray phase contrast and diffraction method for in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Eric E Bennett; Rael Kopace; Ashley F Stein; Han Wen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Interpretation of dark-field contrast and particle-size selectivity in grating interferometers.

Authors:  Susanna K Lynch; Vinay Pai; Julie Auxier; Ashley F Stein; Eric E Bennett; Camille K Kemble; Xianghui Xiao; Wah-Keat Lee; Nicole Y Morgan; Han Harold Wen
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Hard-X-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer.

Authors:  F Pfeiffer; M Bech; O Bunk; P Kraft; E F Eikenberry; Ch Brönnimann; C Grünzweig; C David
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Experimental results from a preclinical X-ray phase-contrast CT scanner.

Authors:  Arne Tapfer; Martin Bech; Astrid Velroyen; Jan Meiser; Jürgen Mohr; Marco Walter; Joachim Schulz; Bart Pauwels; Peter Bruyndonckx; Xuan Liu; Alexander Sasov; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Two-dimensional grating-based X-ray phase-contrast imaging using Fourier transform phase retrieval.

Authors:  Hidenosuke Itoh; Kentaro Nagai; Genta Sato; Kimiaki Yamaguchi; Takashi Nakamura; Takeshi Kondoh; Chidane Ouchi; Takayuki Teshima; Yutaka Setomoto; Toru Den
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Talbot phase-contrast x-ray imaging for the small joints of the hand.

Authors:  Dan Stutman; Thomas J Beck; John A Carrino; Clifton O Bingham
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Diagnosing and mapping pulmonary emphysema on X-ray projection images: incremental value of grating-based X-ray dark-field imaging.

Authors:  Felix G Meinel; Felix Schwab; Simone Schleede; Martin Bech; Julia Herzen; Klaus Achterhold; Sigrid Auweter; Fabian Bamberg; Ali Ö Yildirim; Alexander Bohla; Oliver Eickelberg; Rod Loewen; Martin Gifford; Ronald Ruth; Maximilian F Reiser; Franz Pfeiffer; Konstantin Nikolaou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  45 in total

1.  X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano-Bio Interface.

Authors:  Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; John M Abendroth; Tobias Beck; Robert Blick; Yuan Cao; Frank Caruso; Indranath Chakraborty; Henry N Chapman; Chunying Chen; Bruce E Cohen; Andre L C Conceição; David P Cormode; Daxiang Cui; Kenneth A Dawson; Gerald Falkenberg; Chunhai Fan; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Elisabetta Gargioni; Claus-C Glüer; Florian Grüner; Moustapha Hassan; Yong Hu; Yalan Huang; Samuel Huber; Nils Huse; Yanan Kang; Ali Khademhosseini; Thomas F Keller; Christian Körnig; Nicholas A Kotov; Dorota Koziej; Xing-Jie Liang; Beibei Liu; Sijin Liu; Yang Liu; Ziyao Liu; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Andres Machicote; Wolfgang Maison; Adrian P Mancuso; Saad Megahed; Bert Nickel; Ferdinand Otto; Cristina Palencia; Sakura Pascarelli; Arwen Pearson; Oula Peñate-Medina; Bing Qi; Joachim Rädler; Joseph J Richardson; Axel Rosenhahn; Kai Rothkamm; Michael Rübhausen; Milan K Sanyal; Raymond E Schaak; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Marius Schmidt; Oliver Schmutzler; Theo Schotten; Florian Schulz; A K Sood; Kathryn M Spiers; Theresa Staufer; Dominik M Stemer; Andreas Stierle; Xing Sun; Gohar Tsakanova; Paul S Weiss; Horst Weller; Fabian Westermeier; Ming Xu; Huijie Yan; Yuan Zeng; Ying Zhao; Yuliang Zhao; Dingcheng Zhu; Ying Zhu; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  X-ray Phase Contrast Allows Three Dimensional, Quantitative Imaging of Hydrogel Implants.

Authors:  Alyssa A Appel; Jeffery C Larson; Bin Jiang; Zhong Zhong; Mark A Anastasio; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils.

Authors:  Marios Georgiadis; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Improved reconstruction of phase-stepping data for Talbot-Lau x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Kaeppler; Jens Rieger; Georg Pelzer; Florian Horn; Thilo Michel; Andreas Maier; Gisela Anton; Christian Riess
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 5.  [X‑ray Phase Contrast : Principles, potential and advances in clinical translation].

Authors:  F Pfeiffer; M Reiser; E Rummeny
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Design optimization of a periodic microstructured array anode for hard x-ray grating interferometry.

Authors:  Guibin Zan; David John Vine; Richard Ian Spink; Wenbing Yun; Qiuping Wang; Ge Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Investigation of spatial resolution characteristics of an in vivo micro computed tomography system.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Zhongxing Zhou; Liqiang Ren; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Kai Yang; Hong Liu
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.455

8.  AHA classification of coronary and carotid atherosclerotic plaques by grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Holger Hetterich; Nicole Webber; Marian Willner; Julia Herzen; Lorenz Birnbacher; Alexander Hipp; Mathias Marschner; Sigrid D Auweter; Christopher Habbel; Ulrich Schüller; Fabian Bamberg; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Franz Pfeiffer; Tobias Saam
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Micro-CT of rodents: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Authors:  D P Clark; C T Badea
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 10.  Next-Generation Hardware Advances in CT: Cardiac Applications.

Authors:  Alan C Kwan; Amir Pourmorteza; Dan Stutman; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.