Literature DB >> 25954389

Clinical Decision Support-based Quality Measurement (CDS-QM) Framework: Prototype Implementation, Evaluation, and Future Directions.

Polina V Kukhareva1, Kensaku Kawamoto1, David E Shields1, Darryl T Barfuss2, Anne M Halley2, Tyler J Tippetts1, Phillip B Warner1, Bruce E Bray1, Catherine J Staes1.   

Abstract

Electronic quality measurement (QM) and clinical decision support (CDS) are closely related but are typically implemented independently, resulting in significant duplication of effort. While it seems intuitive that technical approaches could be re-used across these two related use cases, such reuse is seldom reported in the literature, especially for standards-based approaches. Therefore, we evaluated the feasibility of using a standards-based CDS framework aligned with anticipated EHR certification criteria to implement electronic QM. The CDS-QM framework was used to automate a complex national quality measure (SCIP-VTE-2) at an academic healthcare system which had previously relied on time-consuming manual chart abstractions. Compared with 305 manually-reviewed reference cases, the recall of automated measurement was 100%. The precision was 96.3% (CI:92.6%-98.5%) for ascertaining the denominator and 96.2% (CI:92.3%-98.4%) for the numerator. We therefore validated that a standards-based CDS-QM framework can successfully enable automated QM, and we identified benefits and challenges with this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25954389      PMCID: PMC4419969     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures.

Authors:  Robert H Dolin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Increasing demands for quality measurement.

Authors:  Robert J Panzer; Richard S Gitomer; William H Greene; Patricia Reagan Webster; Kevin R Landry; Charles A Riccobono
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The stage 3 meaningful use preliminary recommendations: concerns are being raised.

Authors:  Amy M Joseph
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  2013-07

4.  Clinical information system services and capabilities desired for scalable, standards-based, service-oriented decision support: consensus assessment of the Health Level 7 clinical decision support Work Group.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; Jason Jacobs; Brandon M Welch; Vojtech Huser; Marilyn D Paterno; Guilherme Del Fiol; David Shields; Howard R Strasberg; Peter J Haug; Zhijing Liu; Robert A Jenders; David W Rowed; Daryl Chertcoff; Karsten Fehre; Klaus-Peter Adlassnig; A Clayton Curtis
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure.

Authors:  Ali S Raja; Anurag Gupta; Ivan K Ip; Angela M Mills; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  A J Palmer; W Schramm; B Kirchhof; R Bergemann
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

7.  Impact of an electronic medical record-based clinical decision support tool for dysphagia screening on care quality.

Authors:  Kamakshi Lakshminarayan; Nassir Rostambeigi; Candace C Fuller; James M Peacock; Albert W Tsai
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Sameer Malhotra; Yolanda Barrón; Jill Quaresimo; Rina Dhopeshwarkar; Michelle Pichardo; Alison M Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  More quality measures versus measuring what matters: a call for balance and parsimony.

Authors:  Gregg S Meyer; Eugene C Nelson; David B Pryor; Brent James; Stephen J Swensen; Gary S Kaplan; Jed I Weissberg; Maureen Bisognano; Gary R Yates; Gordon C Hunt
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  e-Measures: insight into the challenges and opportunities of automating publicly reported quality measures.

Authors:  Terhilda Garrido; Sudheen Kumar; John Lekas; Mark Lindberg; Dhanyaja Kadiyala; Alan Whippy; Barbara Crawford; Jed Weissberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  7 in total

1.  Integration of Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement: Domain Expert Insights and Implications for Future Direction.

Authors:  Polina Kukhareva; Charlene R Weir; Catherine Staes; Damian Borbolla; Stacey Slager; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  The Nature and Variability of Automated Practice Alerts Derived from Electronic Health Records in a U.S. Nationwide Critical Care Research Network.

Authors:  Cody Benthin; Sonal Pannu; Akram Khan; Michelle Gong
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-10

3.  Design, Development, and Initial Evaluation of a Terminology for Clinical Decision Support and Electronic Clinical Quality Measurement.

Authors:  Yanhua Lin; Catherine J Staes; David E Shields; Vijay Kandula; Brandon M Welch; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

4.  Challenges and Solutions in Optimizing Execution Performance of a Clinical Decision Support-Based Quality Measurement (CDS-QM) Framework.

Authors:  Tyler J Tippetts; Phillip B Warner; Polina V Kukhareva; David E Shields; Catherine J Staes; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

5.  Automatic quality improvement reports in the intensive care unit: One step closer toward meaningful use.

Authors:  Mikhail A Dziadzko; Charat Thongprayoon; Adil Ahmed; Ing C Tiong; Man Li; Daniel R Brown; Brian W Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  GARDE: a standards-based clinical decision support platform for identifying population health management cohorts.

Authors:  Richard L Bradshaw; Kensaku Kawamoto; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Wendy K Kohlmann; Rachel Hess; Michael C Flynn; Claude J Nanjo; Phillip B Warner; Jianlin Shi; Keaton Morgan; Kadyn Kimball; Pallavi Ranade-Kharkar; Ophira Ginsburg; Melody Goodman; Rachelle Chambers; Devin Mann; Scott P Narus; Javier Gonzalez; Shane Loomis; Priscilla Chan; Rachel Monahan; Emerson P Borsato; David E Shields; Douglas K Martin; Cecilia M Kessler; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Standards-Based Clinical Decision Support Platform to Manage Patients Who Meet Guideline-Based Criteria for Genetic Evaluation of Familial Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Del Fiol; Wendy Kohlmann; Richard L Bradshaw; Charlene R Weir; Michael Flynn; Rachel Hess; Joshua D Schiffman; Claude Nanjo; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.