Chris Tonner1, Gabriela Schmajuk, Jinoos Yazdany. 1. aDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco bDivision of Rheumatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the evolution of quality measurement in rheumatology, highlighting new health-information technology infrastructure and standards that are enabling unprecedented innovation in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Spurred by landmark legislation that ties physician payment to value, the widespread use of electronic health records, and standards such as the Quality Data Model, quality measurement in rheumatology is rapidly evolving. Rather than relying on retrospective assessments of care gathered through administrative claims or manual chart abstraction, new electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) allow automated data capture from electronic health records. At the same time, qualified clinical data registries, like the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry, are enabling large-scale implementation of eCQMs across national electronic health record networks with real-time performance feedback to clinicians. Although successful examples of eCQM development and implementation in rheumatology and other fields exist, there also remain challenges, such as lack of health system data interoperability and problems with measure accuracy. SUMMARY: Quality measurement and improvement is increasingly an essential component of rheumatology practice. Advances in health information technology are likely to continue to make implementation of eCQMs easier and measurement more clinically meaningful and accurate in coming years.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the evolution of quality measurement in rheumatology, highlighting new health-information technology infrastructure and standards that are enabling unprecedented innovation in this field. RECENT FINDINGS: Spurred by landmark legislation that ties physician payment to value, the widespread use of electronic health records, and standards such as the Quality Data Model, quality measurement in rheumatology is rapidly evolving. Rather than relying on retrospective assessments of care gathered through administrative claims or manual chart abstraction, new electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) allow automated data capture from electronic health records. At the same time, qualified clinical data registries, like the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness registry, are enabling large-scale implementation of eCQMs across national electronic health record networks with real-time performance feedback to clinicians. Although successful examples of eCQM development and implementation in rheumatology and other fields exist, there also remain challenges, such as lack of health system data interoperability and problems with measure accuracy. SUMMARY: Quality measurement and improvement is increasingly an essential component of rheumatology practice. Advances in health information technology are likely to continue to make implementation of eCQMs easier and measurement more clinically meaningful and accurate in coming years.
Authors: Jeremy B Shelton; Ted A Skolarus; Diana Ordin; Jennifer Malin; AnnaLiza Antonio; Joan Ryoo; Christopher S Saigal Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Katherine M Newton; Peggy L Peissig; Abel Ngo Kho; Suzette J Bielinski; Richard L Berg; Vidhu Choudhary; Melissa Basford; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; Leslie Spangler; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: S Emani; D Y Ting; M Healey; S R Lipsitz; A S Karson; J S Einbinder; L Leinen; V Suric; D W Bates Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Pradeep Sharma; Tarun Arora; Aseem Bharat; Itara Barnes; Michael A Morrisey; Meredith Kilgore; Kenneth G Saag; Nicole C Wright; Huifen G Yun; Elizabeth Delzell Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christopher P Danford; Ann Marie Navar-Boggan; Judy Stafford; Catherine McCarver; Eric D Peterson; Tracy Y Wang Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Catherine H MacLean; Kenneth G Saag; Daniel H Solomon; Sally C Morton; Sarah Sampsel; John H Klippel Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-04-15
Authors: Jyotishman Pathak; Kent R Bailey; Calvin E Beebe; Steven Bethard; David C Carrell; Pei J Chen; Dmitriy Dligach; Cory M Endle; Lacey A Hart; Peter J Haug; Stanley M Huff; Vinod C Kaggal; Dingcheng Li; Hongfang Liu; Kyle Marchant; James Masanz; Timothy Miller; Thomas A Oniki; Martha Palmer; Kevin J Peterson; Susan Rea; Guergana K Savova; Craig R Stancl; Sunghwan Sohn; Harold R Solbrig; Dale B Suesse; Cui Tao; David P Taylor; Les Westberg; Stephen Wu; Ning Zhuo; Christopher G Chute Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Terhilda Garrido; Sudheen Kumar; John Lekas; Mark Lindberg; Dhanyaja Kadiyala; Alan Whippy; Barbara Crawford; Jed Weissberg Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Catherine Byrd; Ureka Ajawara; Ryan Laundry; John Radin; Prasha Bhandari; Ann Leung; Summer Han; Stephen M Asch; Steven Zeliadt; Alex H S Harris; Leah Backhus Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Kevin L Winthrop; Michael E Weinblatt; Joan Bathon; Gerd R Burmester; Philip J Mease; Leslie Crofford; Vivian Bykerk; Maxime Dougados; James Todd Rosenbaum; Xavier Mariette; Joachim Sieper; Fritz Melchers; Bruce N Cronstein; Ferry C Breedveld; Joachim Kalden; Josef S Smolen; Daniel Furst Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 19.103