PURPOSE: Cancer-specific endothelial markers available for intravascular binding are promising targets for new molecular therapies. In this study, a molecular imaging approach of quantifying endothelial marker concentrations (EMCI) is developed and tested in highly light-absorbing melanomas. The approach involves injection of targeted imaging tracer in conjunction with an untargeted tracer, which is used to account for nonspecific uptake and tissue optical property effects on measured targeted tracer concentrations. PROCEDURES: Theoretical simulations and a mouse melanoma model experiment were used to test out the EMCI approach. The tracers used in the melanoma experiments were fluorescently labeled anti-Plvap/PV1 antibody (plasmalemma vesicle associated protein Plvap/PV1 is a transmembrane protein marker exposed on the luminal surface of endothelial cells in tumor vasculature) and a fluorescent isotype control antibody, the uptakes of which were measured on a planar fluorescence imaging system. RESULTS: The EMCI model was found to be robust to experimental noise under reversible and irreversible binding conditions and was capable of predicting expected overexpression of PV1 in melanomas compared to healthy skin despite a 5-time higher measured fluorescence in healthy skin compared to melanoma: attributable to substantial light attenuation from melanin in the tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential of EMCI to quantify endothelial marker concentrations in vivo, an accomplishment that is currently unavailable through any other methods, either in vivo or ex vivo.
PURPOSE:Cancer-specific endothelial markers available for intravascular binding are promising targets for new molecular therapies. In this study, a molecular imaging approach of quantifying endothelial marker concentrations (EMCI) is developed and tested in highly light-absorbing melanomas. The approach involves injection of targeted imaging tracer in conjunction with an untargeted tracer, which is used to account for nonspecific uptake and tissue optical property effects on measured targeted tracer concentrations. PROCEDURES: Theoretical simulations and a mousemelanoma model experiment were used to test out the EMCI approach. The tracers used in the melanoma experiments were fluorescently labeled anti-Plvap/PV1 antibody (plasmalemma vesicle associated protein Plvap/PV1 is a transmembrane protein marker exposed on the luminal surface of endothelial cells in tumor vasculature) and a fluorescent isotype control antibody, the uptakes of which were measured on a planar fluorescence imaging system. RESULTS: The EMCI model was found to be robust to experimental noise under reversible and irreversible binding conditions and was capable of predicting expected overexpression of PV1 in melanomas compared to healthy skin despite a 5-time higher measured fluorescence in healthy skin compared to melanoma: attributable to substantial light attenuation from melanin in the tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential of EMCI to quantify endothelial marker concentrations in vivo, an accomplishment that is currently unavailable through any other methods, either in vivo or ex vivo.
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Kenneth M Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe; Kristian J Sexton; Jason R Gunn; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Radu V Stan; Dan Tse; Sophie J Deharvengt; Nicole C Smits; Yan Xu; Marcus R Luciano; Caitlin L McGarry; Maarten Buitendijk; Krishnamurthy V Nemani; Raul Elgueta; Takashi Kobayashi; Samantha L Shipman; Karen L Moodie; Charles P Daghlian; Patricia A Ernst; Hong-Kee Lee; Arief A Suriawinata; Alan R Schned; Daniel S Longnecker; Steven N Fiering; Randolph J Noelle; Barjor Gimi; Nicholas W Shworak; Catherine Carrière Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Danni Wang; Ye Chen; Steven Y Leigh; Henry Haeberle; Christopher H Contag; Jonathan T C Liu Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Vladimir Tolmachev; Daniel Rosik; Helena Wållberg; Anna Sjöberg; Mattias Sandström; Monika Hansson; Anders Wennborg; Anna Orlova Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-01-25 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kristian Sexton; Kenneth Tichauer; Kimberley S Samkoe; Jason Gunn; P Jack Hoopes; Brian W Pogue Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason R Gunn; Wendy A Wells; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Vladimir V Shuvaev; Makan Khoshnejad; Katherine W Pulsipher; Raisa Yu Kiseleva; Evguenia Arguiri; Jasmina C Cheung-Lau; Kathleen M LeFort; Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou; Radu V Stan; Ivan J Dmochowski; Vladimir R Muzykantov Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Nathan P McMahon; Allison Solanki; Jocelyn Jones; Sunjong Kwon; Young-Hwan Chang; Koei Chin; Michel A Nederlof; Joe W Gray; Summer L Gibbs Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2020-02-19