Literature DB >> 24214632

Processing demands during mental operations.

B Kerr1.   

Abstract

Man possesses a central system of limited capacity. Theorists at first described this system as a single limited capacity channel Two current theoretical alternatives to single-channel theory are (1) the undifferentiated capacity hypothesis that man possesses a pool of capacity units so that interference occurs oniy if the total number of capacity units that mental operations demand exceeds the system limit and (2) the hypothesis that some, but not all, mental operations require space in a limited capacity central mechanism and that any operation that requires space will interfere with any other operation that also demands space. Time on task fails as a sensitive measure of capacity demands because some task components require time but not full processing capacity. The secondary task technique uses the interference between a primary task and a secondary task to assess the extent to which the primary task makes processing demands on the central limited system. Processing demands have been measured for five categories of mental operation: (1) encoding, (2) multiple input, (3) rehearsal, (4) transformation, and (5) responding.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 24214632     DOI: 10.3758/BF03208899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  DISCRIMINATION REACTION TIME FOR 1,023-ALTERNATIVE TASK.

Authors:  R SEIBEL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-09

2.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

3.  Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task.

Authors:  D Kahneman; J Beatty; I Pollack
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Dual functions of consciousness.

Authors:  T Shallice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis.

Authors:  D A Allport; B Antonis; P Reynolds
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period.

Authors:  L Karlin; R Kestenbaum
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes.

Authors:  W A Johnston; S N Greenberg; R P Fisher; D W Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

Review 8.  Central intermittency twenty years later.

Authors:  P Bertelson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Effect of size and location of informational transforms upon short-term retention.

Authors:  M I Posner; E Rossman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11

10.  Perceptual deficit due to division of attention between memory and perception.

Authors:  H G Shulman; S N Greenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05
View more
  31 in total

1.  A multi-dimensional analysis of cue-elicited craving in heavy smokers and tobacco chippers.

Authors:  M A Sayette; C S Martin; J M Wertz; S Shiffman; M A Perrott
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  The measurement of drug craving.

Authors:  M A Sayette; S Shiffman; S T Tiffany; R S Niaura; C S Martin; W G Shadel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  The influence of visual and auditory images on the recall of items of visual and auditory presentation mode.

Authors:  H G Bosshardt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1975-03-06

Review 4.  How much "effort" should be devoted to memory?

Authors:  D B Mitchell; R R Hunt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

5.  Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Inferring decay in short-term memory: The issue of capacity.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J L Knight; B H Kantowitz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-03

7.  Stage 2 processing and the divided-attention effect.

Authors:  D Griffith; W A Johnston
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-09

8.  Secondary-task effects on sequence learning.

Authors:  H Heuer; V Schmidtke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

9.  Immediately preceding stimuli increase the detection of a less detectable but not a more detectable stimulus.

Authors:  D L King
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1996

10.  The attentional demands of negation in a memory-scanning task.

Authors:  J H Howard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.