Literature DB >> 24203229

Stage 2 processing and the divided-attention effect.

D Griffith1, W A Johnston.   

Abstract

In two experiments subjects performed a choice-reaction-time (CRT) task and a second task concurrently. The second task was a simple reaction-time task in Experiment 1 and sentence generation and recall tasks in Experiment 2. Both studies yielded two main findings: Performance of the second task was not affected by CRT memory load (one, two, or four items), and the requirement to perform the second task did not affect the rate of increase of CRT with memory load. The first finding indicates that the effect of memory load on CRT is attributable to memory scanning, or Stage 2 processing, and is not an artifact of the rehearsal demands of the CRT memory set. The second finding indicates that Stage 2 processing is not sensitive to division of attention between the CRT and a second task.

Year:  1977        PMID: 24203229     DOI: 10.3758/BF03197405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions.

Authors:  E E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments.

Authors:  S Sternberg
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 0.548

3.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01

4.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes.

Authors:  W A Johnston; S N Greenberg; R P Fisher; D W Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

5.  Processing demands during mental operations.

Authors:  B Kerr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.