Literature DB >> 24214343

Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate per nucleotide site in a Drosophila melanogaster full-sib family.

Peter D Keightley1, Rob W Ness, Daniel L Halligan, Penelope R Haddrill.   

Abstract

We employed deep genome sequencing of two parents and 12 of their offspring to estimate the mutation rate per site per generation in a full-sib family of Drosophila melanogaster recently sampled from a natural population. Sites that were homozygous for the same allele in the parents and heterozygous in one or more offspring were categorized as candidate mutations and subjected to detailed analysis. In 1.23 × 10(9) callable sites from 12 individuals, we confirmed six single nucleotide mutations. We estimated the false negative rate in the experiment by generating synthetic mutations using the empirical distributions of numbers of nonreference bases at heterozygous sites in the offspring. The proportion of synthetic mutations at callable sites that we failed to detect was <1%, implying that the false negative rate was extremely low. Our estimate of the point mutation rate is 2.8 × 10(-9) (95% confidence interval = 1.0 × 10(-9) - 6.1 × 10(-9)) per site per generation, which is at the low end of the range of previous estimates, and suggests an effective population size for the species of ∼1.4 × 10(6). At one site, point mutations were present in two individuals, indicating that there had been a premeiotic mutation cluster, although surprisingly one individual had a G→A transition and the other a G→T transversion, possibly associated with error-prone mismatch repair. We also detected three short deletion mutations and no insertions, giving a deletion mutation rate of 1.2 × 10(-9) (95% confidence interval = 0.7 × 10(-9) - 11 × 10(-9)).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophilla; Genome sequencing; mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24214343      PMCID: PMC3872194          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.158758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

1.  Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution.

Authors:  Way Sung; Matthew S Ackerman; Samuel F Miller; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Whole-genome sequencing in autism identifies hot spots for de novo germline mutation.

Authors:  Jacob J Michaelson; Yujian Shi; Madhusudan Gujral; Hancheng Zheng; Dheeraj Malhotra; Xin Jin; Minghan Jian; Guangming Liu; Douglas Greer; Abhishek Bhandari; Wenting Wu; Roser Corominas; Aine Peoples; Amnon Koren; Athurva Gore; Shuli Kang; Guan Ning Lin; Jasper Estabillo; Therese Gadomski; Balvindar Singh; Kun Zhang; Natacha Akshoomoff; Christina Corsello; Steven McCarroll; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Yingrui Li; Jun Wang; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Variation in genome-wide mutation rates within and between human families.

Authors:  Donald F Conrad; Jonathan E M Keebler; Mark A DePristo; Sarah J Lindsay; Yujun Zhang; Ferran Casals; Youssef Idaghdour; Chris L Hartl; Carlos Torroja; Kiran V Garimella; Martine Zilversmit; Reed Cartwright; Guy A Rouleau; Mark Daly; Eric A Stone; Matthew E Hurles; Philip Awadalla
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Estimate of the spontaneous mutation rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Rob W Ness; Andrew D Morgan; Nick Colegrave; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Whole genome sequencing of mutation accumulation lines reveals a low mutation rate in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Gerda Saxer; Paul Havlak; Sara A Fox; Michael A Quance; Sharu Gupta; Yuriy Fofanov; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration.

Authors:  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; James T Robinson; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Genetic diversity, population structure and Wolbachia infection status in a worldwide sample of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations.

Authors:  Rudi L Verspoor; Penelope R Haddrill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Circumventing heterozygosity: sequencing the amplified genome of a single haploid Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Marc Crepeau; Charis Cardeno; Russell Corbett-Detig; Kristian Stevens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk.

Authors:  Augustine Kong; Michael L Frigge; Gisli Masson; Soren Besenbacher; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Magnusson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Wendy S W Wong; Gunnar Sigurdsson; G Bragi Walters; Stacy Steinberg; Hannes Helgason; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Agnar Helgason; Olafur Th Magnusson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  76 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The repeatability of genome-wide mutation rate and spectrum estimates.

Authors:  Megan G Behringer; David W Hall
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Genetics: Feedforward loop for diversity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Parent-progeny sequencing indicates higher mutation rates in heterozygotes.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Long Wang; Ju Huang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yang Yuan; Jian-Qun Chen; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  From Peas to Disease: Modifier Genes, Network Resilience, and the Genetics of Health.

Authors:  Jesse D Riordan; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Inferring Demographic History Using Two-Locus Statistics.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Matthew S Ackerman; Jean-Francois Gout; Hongan Long; Way Sung; W Kelley Thomas; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Heterogeneity of primordial germ cells.

Authors:  Daniel H Nguyen; Rebecca G Jaszczak; Diana J Laird
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.