Literature DB >> 24213597

Body and head tilt reveals multiple frames of reference for spatial attention.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Khena M Swallow.   

Abstract

Most modern theories of spatial attention suggest that it is based on a maplike representation that prioritizes information in some spatial locations over others. However, movement through space changes the relationship between what is "out there" and a person's viewpoint. Does spatial attention move with the viewer, or does it stay in environmental locations? Several recent psychophysical and neuroscience studies have attempted to address this question by probing attention following saccadic eye movements. The alignment of the head and body to the external environment in these studies, however, makes it impossible to determine whether attention is based on the viewer's location in space or on the external environment. The current study therefore introduces a head and/or body tilt through the vertical plane to dissociate viewer-centered from environment-centered representations. Participants first acquired a long-lasting attentional bias to a region of the search display that was likely to contain a target. They then tilted their head or body, and the location of the spatial bias was evaluated. The results suggest that attention has both a viewer-centered component that rotates with the viewer's head and an environment-centered component that is tied to environmental locations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; spatial reference frame; visual search; visual statistical learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24213597     DOI: 10.1167/13.13.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

Review 1.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Bo-Yeong Won; Khena M Swallow; Dominic M Mussack
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow; Bo-Yeong Won; Julia D Cistera; Gail M Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Saccades Trigger Predictive Updating of Attentional Topography in Area V4.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; James A Mazer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Is visuomotor training an effective intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders?

Authors:  Manizheh Arabi; Alireza Saberi Kakhki; Mehdi Sohrabi; Sakineh Soltani Kouhbanani; Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 7.  Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Alexandria C Marino; James A Mazer
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-05

8.  Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Tamara Giménez-Fernández; David Luque; David R Shanks; Miguel A Vadillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.