Literature DB >> 32921945

Preoperative external rotation deficit does not predict poor outcomes or lack of improvement after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Moby Parsons1, Howard D Routman2, Christopher P Roche3, Richard J Friedman4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose was to compare postoperative outcomes and functional improvement between patients with preoperative aER deficits vs. preserved aER function.
RESULTS: There were 115 patients in the <0° aER group and 314 in the ≥30° aER group. Preoperative patients in the <0° group were worse for all measures except subjective pain while post-operatively, they had significantly greater improvement for all measures of motion. Postoperatively, both groups achieved comparable scores for forward elevation, pain, SST and ASES.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with a complete aER deficit can recover substantial and comparable function after RTSA.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cuff tear arthropathy; External rotation; Outcomes; Reverse total shoulder; Rotator cuff tear

Year:  2020        PMID: 32921945      PMCID: PMC7475072          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  22 in total

1.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Prosthesis Design Classification System.

Authors:  Howard D Routman; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Matthew A Hamilton; Christopher P Roche
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2015-12

2.  Effect of reverse shoulder design philosophy on muscle moment arms.

Authors:  Matthew A Hamilton; Phong Diep; Chris Roche; Pierre Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Howard Routman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  A reverse shoulder arthroplasty with increased offset for the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulders with glenohumeral arthritis.

Authors:  C Middleton; O Uri; S Phillips; K Barmpagiannis; D Higgs; M Falworth; I Bayley; S Lambert
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; Joshua W Giles; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Effect of lateralized design on muscle and joint reaction forces for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  William Liou; Yang Yang; Graysen R Petersen-Fitts; Daniel J Lombardo; Sasha Stine; Vani J Sabesan
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Improved external rotation with concomitant reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron Wey; John C Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Brian R Waterman; Kelly G Kilcoyne
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2017 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.118

7.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

8.  Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders.

Authors:  Brent Mollon; Siddharth A Mahure; Christopher P Roche; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength?

Authors:  Andreas M Müller; Marian Born; Christian Jung; Matthias Flury; Christoph Kolling; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching?

Authors:  Philippe Valenti; Philippe Sauzières; Denis Katz; Ibrahim Kalouche; Alexandre Sahin Kilinc
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.