Literature DB >> 24210574

Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis.

Joseph P Cusumano1, Jonathan B Dingwell.   

Abstract

Fluctuations in the repeated performance of human movements have been the subject of intense scrutiny because they are generally believed to contain important information about the function and health of the neuromotor system. A variety of approaches has been brought to bear to study these fluctuations. However it is frequently difficult to understand how to synthesize different perspectives to give a coherent picture. Here, we describe a conceptual framework for the experimental study of motor variability that helps to unify geometrical methods, which focus on the role of motor redundancy, with dynamical methods that characterize the error-correcting processes regulating the performance of skilled tasks. We describe how goal functions, which mathematically specify the task strategy being employed, together with ideas from the control of redundant systems, allow one to formulate simple, experimentally testable dynamical models of inter-trial fluctuations. After reviewing the basic theory, we present a list of five general hypotheses on the structure of fluctuations that can be expected in repeated trials of goal-directed tasks. We review recent experimental applications of this general approach, and show how it can be used to precisely characterize the error-correcting control used by human subjects.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2221 Sensory & Motor Testing; 2240 Statistics & Mathematics; Goal equivalence; Motor redundancy; Motor variability; Sensory and motor testing; Statistics and mathematics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210574      PMCID: PMC3858478          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  88 in total

Review 1.  Scale invariance in biology: coincidence or footprint of a universal mechanism?

Authors:  T Gisiger
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-05

2.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Motor memory and local minimization of error and effort, not global optimization, determine motor behavior.

Authors:  G Ganesh; M Haruno; M Kawato; E Burdet
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Assessment of long-range correlation in time series: how to avoid pitfalls.

Authors:  Jianbo Gao; Jing Hu; Wen-Wen Tung; Yinhe Cao; N Sarshar; Vwani P Roychowdhury
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2006-01-13

6.  Influence of simulated neuromuscular noise on the dynamic stability and fall risk of a 3D dynamic walking model.

Authors:  Paulien E Roos; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking.

Authors:  M Y Zarrugh; F N Todd; H J Ralston
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1974

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Evaluation of the threshold of stability for the human spine.

Authors:  Martin L Tanaka; Maury A Nussbaum; Shane D Ross
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Motor task variation induces structural learning.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effects of local and widespread muscle fatigue on movement timing.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cowley; Jonathan B Dingwell; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Increased gait variability may not imply impaired stride-to-stride control of walking in healthy older adults: Winner: 2013 Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society Best Paper Award.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Mandy M Salinas; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Viability, task switching, and fall avoidance of the simplest dynamic walker.

Authors:  Navendu S Patil; Jonathan B Dingwell; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Influence of contextual task constraints on preferred stride parameters and their variabilities during human walking.

Authors:  Lauro V Ojeda; John R Rebula; Arthur D Kuo; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Multi-objective control in human walking: insight gained through simultaneous degradation of energetic and motor regulation systems.

Authors:  Kirsty A McDonald; Joseph P Cusumano; Peter Peeling; Jonas Rubenson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Walking humans trade off different task goals to regulate lateral stepping.

Authors:  Anna C Render; Meghan E Kazanski; Joseph P Cusumano; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The dynamical analysis of inter-trial fluctuations near goal equivalent manifolds.

Authors:  Joseph P Cusumano; Joseph M Mahoney; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task.

Authors:  Joby John; Jonathan B Dingwell; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Identifying stride-to-stride control strategies in human treadmill walking.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Information presentation through a head-worn display ("smart glasses") has a smaller influence on the temporal structure of gait variability during dual-task gait compared to handheld displays (paper-based system and smartphone).

Authors:  Alireza Sedighi; Sophia M Ulman; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.