Literature DB >> 20484533

Motor memory and local minimization of error and effort, not global optimization, determine motor behavior.

G Ganesh1, M Haruno, M Kawato, E Burdet.   

Abstract

Many real life tasks that require impedance control to minimize motion error are characterized by multiple solutions where the task can be performed either by co-contracting muscle groups, which requires a large effort, or, conversely, by relaxing muscles. However, human motor optimization studies have focused on tasks that are always satisfied by increasing impedance and that are characterized by a single error-effort optimum. To investigate motor optimization in the presence of multiple solutions and hence optima, we introduce a novel paradigm that enables us to let subjects repetitively (but inconspicuously) use different solutions and observe how exploration of multiple solutions affect their motor behavior. The results show that the behavior is largely influenced by motor memory with subjects tending to involuntarily repeat a recent suboptimal task-satisfying solution even after sufficient experience of the optimal solution. This suggests that the CNS does not optimize co-activation tasks globally but determines the motor behavior in a tradeoff of motor memory, error, and effort minimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484533     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01058.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  41 in total

1.  Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control.

Authors:  Vishwanathan Mohan; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Muscle coordination is habitual rather than optimal.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Gerald E Loeb; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual information gain and task asymmetry interact in bimanual force coordination and control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The coordinate system for force control.

Authors:  Devjani J Saha; Xiao Hu; Eric Perreault; Wendy Murray; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trial-to-trial dynamics and learning in a generalized, redundant reaching task.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Rachel F Smallwood; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Neuromechanical principles underlying movement modularity and their implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Hillel J Chiel; Randy D Trumbower; Jessica L Allen; J Lucas McKay; Madeleine E Hackney; Trisha M Kesar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Stacie A Chvatal; Seyed A Safavynia; J Lucas McKay
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Learning redundant motor tasks with and without overlapping dimensions: facilitation and interference effects.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Jon Wieser; Kristine M Mosier; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Movement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis.

Authors:  Joseph P Cusumano; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Defining feasible bounds on muscle activation in a redundant biomechanical task: practical implications of redundancy.

Authors:  M Hongchul Sohn; J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.