Literature DB >> 26250066

Influence of contextual task constraints on preferred stride parameters and their variabilities during human walking.

Lauro V Ojeda1, John R Rebula2, Arthur D Kuo1, Peter G Adamczyk3.   

Abstract

Walking is not always a free and unencumbered task. Everyday activities such as walking in pairs, in groups, or on structured walkways can limit the acceptable gait patterns, leading to motor behavior that differs from that observed in more self-selected gait. Such different contexts may lead to gait performance different than observed in typical laboratory experiments, for example, during treadmill walking. We sought to systematically measure the impact of such task constraints by comparing gait parameters and their variability during walking in different conditions over-ground, and on a treadmill. We reconstructed foot motion from foot-mounted inertial sensors, and characterized forward, lateral and angular foot placement while subjects walked over-ground in a straight hallway and on a treadmill. Over-ground walking was performed in three variations: with no constraints (self-selected, SS); while deliberately varying walking speed (self-varied, SV); and while following a toy pace car programmed to vary speed (externally-varied, EV). We expected that these conditions would exhibit a statistically similar relationship between stride length and speed, and between stride length and stride period. We also expected treadmill walking (TM) would differ in two ways: first, that variability in stride length and stride period would conform to a constant-speed constraint opposite in slope from the normal relationship; and second, that stride length would decrease, leading to combinations of stride length and speed not observed in over-ground conditions. Results showed that all over-ground conditions used similar stride length-speed relationships, and that variability in treadmill walking conformed to a constant-speed constraint line, as expected. Decreased stride length was observed in both TM and EV conditions, suggesting adaptations due to heightened awareness or to prepare for unexpected changes or problems. We also evaluated stride variability in constrained and unconstrained tasks. We observed that in treadmill walking, lateral variability decreased while forward variability increased, and the normally-observed correlation between wider foot placement and external foot rotation was eliminated. Preferred stride parameters and their variability appear significantly influenced by the context and constraints of the walking task.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait variability; Goal-equivalence; Inertial sensor; Task constraint; Treadmill walking; Wearable sensor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26250066      PMCID: PMC4604025          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  35 in total

1.  Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects.

Authors:  A Matsas; N Taylor; H McBurney
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion.

Authors:  Tammy M Owings; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Steering behaviour can be modulated by different optic flows during walking.

Authors:  Guillaume Sarre; Jessica Berard; Joyce Fung; Anouk Lamontagne
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Optimal walking in terms of variability in step length.

Authors:  N Sekiya; H Nagasaki; H Ito; T Furuna
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Stepping strategies for regulating gait adaptability and stability.

Authors:  Laura Hak; Han Houdijk; Frans Steenbrink; Agali Mert; Peter van der Wurff; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking.

Authors:  M Y Zarrugh; F N Todd; H J Ralston
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1974

7.  How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability.

Authors:  Galit Yogev-Seligmann; Yael Rotem-Galili; Anat Mirelman; Ruth Dickstein; Nir Giladi; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-12-18

8.  Familiarisation to treadmill walking in unimpaired older people.

Authors:  Erin Wass; Nicholas F Taylor; Angelo Matsas
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Walking, running, and resting under time, distance, and average speed constraints: optimality of walk-run-rest mixtures.

Authors:  Leroy L Long; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking.

Authors:  J Maxwell Donelan; Rodger Kram; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  15 in total

1.  Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Walk with Altered Step Time and Step Width Variability as Compared with Healthy Control Subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yentes; Stephen I Rennard; Kendra K Schmid; Daniel Blanke; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-06

2.  Effect of parameter selection on entropy calculation for long walking trials.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yentes; William Denton; John McCamley; Peter C Raffalt; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Reconstruction of body motion during self-reported losses of balance in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Lauro V Ojeda; Peter G Adamczyk; John R Rebula; Linda V Nyquist; Debra M Strasburg; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Speed-related but not detrended gait variability increases with more sensitive self-paced treadmill controllers at multiple slopes.

Authors:  Cesar R Castano; Helen J Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of IMU Design on IMU-Derived Stride Metrics for Running.

Authors:  Michael V Potter; Lauro V Ojeda; Noel C Perkins; Stephen M Cain
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Altering gait variability with an ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Prokopios Antonellis; Samuel Galle; Dirk De Clercq; Philippe Malcolm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ambulatory Assessment of the Dynamic Margin of Stability Using an Inertial Sensor Network.

Authors:  Michelangelo Guaitolini; Federica Aprigliano; Andrea Mannini; Silvestro Micera; Vito Monaco; Angelo Maria Sabatini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  The Coefficient of Variation of Step Time Can Overestimate Gait Abnormality: Test-Retest Reliability of Gait-Related Parameters Obtained with a Tri-Axial Accelerometer in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Shunrou Fujiwara; Shinpei Sato; Atsushi Sugawara; Yasumasa Nishikawa; Takahiro Koji; Yukihide Nishimura; Kuniaki Ogasawara
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Mechanisms of gait phase entrainment in healthy subjects during rhythmic electrical stimulation of the medial gastrocnemius.

Authors:  Jenna E Thorp; Peter Gabriel Adamczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.