BACKGROUND: Given the high rates of childhood obesity, assessing the nutritional content of food and beverage products in television (TV) advertisements to which children are exposed is important. METHODS: TV ratings data for children 2-5 and 6-11 years of age were used to examine the nutritional content of food and beverage products in advertisements seen by children on all programming and children's programming (≥35% child-audience share). Nutritional content was assessed based on the federal Interagency Working Group (IWG) recommended nutrients to limit (NTL), including saturated fat, trans fat, sugar, and sodium. RESULTS: A total of 46.2% of 2- to 5-year-olds' and 43.5% of 6- to 11-year-olds' total exposure to food and beverage TV advertising was for ads seen on children's programming. Among children 2-5 and 6-11 years, respectively, 84.1 and 84.4% of ads seen on all programming and 95.8 and 97.3% seen on children's programming were for products high in NTL, and 97.8 and 98.1% of Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) company-member ads seen on children's programming were for products high in NTL, compared to 80.5 and 89.9% of non-CFBAI product ads. CONCLUSIONS: Most food and beverage products in TV ads seen by children do not meet the IWG nutrition recommendations and less than one half of such ads are covered by self-regulation. Products advertised on children's versus general-audience programming and by CFBAI- versus non-CFBAI-member companies are particularly of low nutritional quality, suggesting that self-regulation has not successfully protected children from exposure to advertising for unhealthy foods and that continued monitoring is required.
BACKGROUND: Given the high rates of childhood obesity, assessing the nutritional content of food and beverage products in television (TV) advertisements to which children are exposed is important. METHODS: TV ratings data for children 2-5 and 6-11 years of age were used to examine the nutritional content of food and beverage products in advertisements seen by children on all programming and children's programming (≥35% child-audience share). Nutritional content was assessed based on the federal Interagency Working Group (IWG) recommended nutrients to limit (NTL), including saturated fat, trans fat, sugar, and sodium. RESULTS: A total of 46.2% of 2- to 5-year-olds' and 43.5% of 6- to 11-year-olds' total exposure to food and beverage TV advertising was for ads seen on children's programming. Among children 2-5 and 6-11 years, respectively, 84.1 and 84.4% of ads seen on all programming and 95.8 and 97.3% seen on children's programming were for products high in NTL, and 97.8 and 98.1% of Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) company-member ads seen on children's programming were for products high in NTL, compared to 80.5 and 89.9% of non-CFBAI product ads. CONCLUSIONS: Most food and beverage products in TV ads seen by children do not meet the IWG nutrition recommendations and less than one half of such ads are covered by self-regulation. Products advertised on children's versus general-audience programming and by CFBAI- versus non-CFBAI-member companies are particularly of low nutritional quality, suggesting that self-regulation has not successfully protected children from exposure to advertising for unhealthy foods and that continued monitoring is required.
Authors: Lisa M Powell; Rebecca M Schermbeck; Glen Szczypka; Frank J Chaloupka; Carol L Braunschweig Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-08-01
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Edward D Frohlich; John E Hall; Thomas A Pearson; Ralph L Sacco; Douglas R Seals; Frank M Sacks; Sidney C Smith; Dorothea K Vafiadis; Linda V Van Horn Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Laura Nixon; Pamela Mejia; Andrew Cheyne; Cara Wilking; Lori Dorfman; Richard Daynard Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer A Emond; Meghan R Longacre; Keith M Drake; Linda J Titus; Kristy Hendricks; Todd MacKenzie; Jennifer L Harris; Jennifer E Carroll; Lauren P Cleveland; Gail Langeloh; Madeline A Dalton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 5.043