Literature DB >> 24203422

The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability.

R H Maki1, D Jonas, M Kallod.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between the ability to comprehend text and the ability to predict future performance and to assess past performance on text. Subjects were poor at predicting performance, which may be why prediction accuracy did not relate to measures of comprehension ability. Measures of comprehension ability did relate to the accuracy with which subjects assessed their performance on tests. Better and faster comprehenders judged their relative levels of test performance over sections of text more accurately than did poorer and slower comprehenders.

Year:  1994        PMID: 24203422     DOI: 10.3758/BF03200769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  4 in total

1.  Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.

Authors:  M A Gernsbacher; K R Varner; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Metacomprehension of text material.

Authors:  R H Maki; S L Berry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.

Authors:  T O Nelson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 17.737

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.

Authors:  W L Kelemen; P J Frost; C A Weaver
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

2.  The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.

Authors:  K A Rawson; J Dunlosky; K W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

3.  Accuracy of confidence judgments: stability and generality in the learning process and predictive validity for learning outcome.

Authors:  Christoph Mengelkamp; Maria Bannert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.

Authors:  Marion Händel; Eva S Fritzsche
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

5.  Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Authors:  Zubin Austin; Paul A M Gregory
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffin; Jennifer Wiley; Keith W Thiede
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

7.  Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors.

Authors:  Ramona Kessel; Judith Gecht; Thomas Forkmann; Barbara Drueke; Siegfried Gauggel; Verena Mainz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-18

8.  Why the Unskilled Are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight Among the Incompetent.

Authors:  Joyce Ehrlinger; Kerri Johnson; Matthew Banner; David Dunning; Justin Kruger
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2008-01-01

9.  The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffin; Benjamin D Jee; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

10.  So you think you can read? Generalized metacomprehension in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erika K Fulton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2021-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.