Literature DB >> 23955240

Metacognitive monitoring of attention performance and its influencing factors.

Ramona Kessel1, Judith Gecht, Thomas Forkmann, Barbara Drueke, Siegfried Gauggel, Verena Mainz.   

Abstract

Metacognitive monitoring is a central element of metacognitive processing exerting widespread influences on information processing. Albeit being subject to numerous empirical investigations referring to memory performance, there is little research investigating metacognitive monitoring in other cognitive domains. The present study investigated in 45 healthy students whether factors that are known to influence monitoring of memory performance, i.e., task difficulty, time of assessment, and practice, also exhibit a significant impact on monitoring of attention performance. A multivariate analysis of variance with three within-subject repeated measures factors on two dependent variables (monitoring of (a) time, and (b) errors in an attention task) was conducted. Results showed that monitoring ability significantly decreased with increasing task difficulty, was significantly better for post than for pre-assessment, and significantly increased with practice. Therefore, results suggest that the examined factors influenced monitoring of attention performance equivalent to the influence of these factors found in metamemory research.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23955240     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0511-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.

Authors:  W L Kelemen; P J Frost; C A Weaver
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Collecting and managing multisource and multimethod data in studies of pediatric populations.

Authors:  Grayson N Holmbeck; Susan T Li; Jennifer Verrill Schurman; Deborah Friedman; Rachael Millstein Coakley
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

3.  Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: a componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; C Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-09

4.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

5.  How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes.

Authors:  Joseph A Durlak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2009-02-16

6.  The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability.

Authors:  R H Maki; D Jonas; M Kallod
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

7.  Test difficulty and judgment bias.

Authors:  G Schraw; T D Roedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

Review 8.  Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Time perception and the Stroop task.

Authors:  M J Marshall; W E Wilsoncroft
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1989-12
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the relationship of decentering to health related concepts and cognitive and metacognitive processes in a student sample.

Authors:  Ramona Kessel; Judith Gecht; Thomas Forkmann; Barbara Drueke; Siegfried Gauggel; Verena Mainz
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.