Literature DB >> 24202710

Long-term oncologic outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Ayman Agha1, Volker Benseler, Matthias Hornung, Michael Gerken, Igors Iesalnieks, Alois Fürst, Matthias Anthuber, Karl-Walter Jauch, Hans J Schlitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated favorable short- and mid-term results after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, long-term results from large series are lacking. The present study analyses long-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery from a large-volume center.
METHODS: From January 1998 until March 2005, 225 patients underwent laparoscopic rectal resection due to carcinoma at the Medical Centre of the University of Regensburg. From 224 patients, a follow-up over 10 years was performed using the data of the Tumour Centre of the University of Regensburg. The data were analysed using oncological data (tumour recurrence) as well as overall survival. In addition, the effect of conversion to open resection on overall survival was analysed.
RESULTS: With a median of 10 years at follow-up, the overall and disease-free survival was 50.5 and 50.1 %, respectively. Local recurrence of all patients was 5.8 % and none of the converted patients was within this group. The median time interval for the development of local recurrence was 30 months. Six of the 13 patients with local recurrence (46.1 %) had received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy before surgery. Patients with a conversion to open surgery had primarily a significantly worse outcome than patients resected completely laparoscopically (p = 0.003). However, this difference was no longer apparent using a multivariant analysis (hazard ratio 1.221; p = 0.478).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and local recurrence rate of patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer are comparable to open surgery. However, in our analysis, patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection had a higher survival rate compared with patients with abdominoperineal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24202710     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3286-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  22 in total

1.  Sepsis leads to a reduced antigen-specific primary antibody response.

Authors:  Arno Mohr; Johannes Polz; Elisabeth M Martin; Sybille Griessl; Anja Kammler; Christian Pötschke; Anja Lechner; Barbara M Bröker; Sven Mostböck; Daniela N Männel
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer in Germany 2000-2009.

Authors:  P Mroczkowski; S Hac; B Smith; U Schmidt; H Lippert; R Kube
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The pathological assessment of mesorectal excision: implications for further treatment and quality management.

Authors:  P Hermanek; P Hermanek; W Hohenberger; M Klimpfinger; F Köckerling; T Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Alois Fürst; Johanna Hierl; Igors Iesalnieks; Gabriel Glockzin; Matthias Anthuber; Karl-Walter Jauch; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome.

Authors:  A Agha; A Fürst; I Iesalnieks; S Fichtner-Feigl; N Ghali; D Krenz; M Anthuber; K W Jauch; P Piso; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Management of more frequent complications of laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive or always open surgery?].

Authors:  K Ludwig; U Scharlau; S Schneider Koriath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Critical appraisal of laparoscopic vs open rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Winson Jianhong Tan; Min Hoe Chew; Angela Renayanti Dharmawan; Manraj Singh; Sanchalika Acharyya; Carol Tien Tau Loi; Choong Leong Tang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

Review 4.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [Scientific evidence for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery].

Authors:  A Fürst; A Heiligensetzer; P Sauer; G Liebig-Hörl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amit Merchea; Shahzad M Ali; Scott R Kelley; Emilie Duchalais; Jasim Y Alabbad; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Long-term outcomes and propensity score matching analysis: rectal cancer resection for patients with elevated preoperative risk.

Authors:  Hao Feng; Tobias S Schiergens; Zhi-Hai Mao; Jingkun Zhao; Xiaohui Shen; Ai-Guo Lu; Wolfgang E Thasler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.