Literature DB >> 29594912

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Amit Merchea1, Shahzad M Ali2, Scott R Kelley3, Emilie Duchalais3, Jasim Y Alabbad3, Eric J Dozois3, David W Larson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal adenocarcinoma compared to open surgery continue to be debated. We aimed to review our high-volume single-institution outcomes in MIS rectal cancer surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was completed of all consecutive adult patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated from January 2005 through December 2011. Stage IV or recurrent disease was excluded. Demographics and operative and pathologic details were reviewed and reported. Primary endpoints include survival and recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included and median follow-up was 54 months (IQR = 37.0, 78.8). The mean age was 58.2 ± 14.1 years. Tumors were in the upper rectum in 111 patients, mid-rectum in 113 patients, and lower rectum in 100 patients. Stage III disease was most common (49.4%). Overall conversion to open procedure rate was 13.9%. The circumferential radial margin was positive in only 1 patient (0.3%) and the mean lymph node yield was 24.7 ± 17.2. Cancer recurred in 42 patients (13%), 10 (2.5%) patients developed local recurrence, 32 (9.8%) developed distant metastasis, and 2 (0.6%) patients had both. The 5-year overall survival for stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 disease is 96, 91, 80, and 77%, respectively (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSION: In carefully selected rectal cancer patients treated with MIS, long-term outcomes of survival and recurrence appear to compare favorably to previously published series.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIS; Minimally invasive surgery; Proctectomy; Rectal adenocarcinoma; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594912     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3751-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  24 in total

Review 1.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial.

Authors:  Cristiano G S Huscher; Frederic Bretagnol; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; David H Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Analysis of surgical salvage after failure of primary therapy in rectal cancer: results from Intergroup Study 0114.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M O'Connell; D Hollis; D Niedzwiecki; E Cooke; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Outcomes of Resected Colorectal Cancer Lung Metastases in Routine Clinical Practice: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Christopher M Booth; Sulaiman Nanji; Xuejiao Wei; William J Mackillop
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Vennix; Loeki Pelzers; Nicole Bouvy; Geerard L Beets; Jean-Pierre Pierie; Theo Wiggers; Stephanie Breukink
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-15

7.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhifei Sun; Jina Kim; Mohamed A Adam; Daniel P Nussbaum; Paul J Speicher; Christopher R Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Surgical resection and peri-operative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A population-based study.

Authors:  C M Booth; S Nanji; X Wei; J J Biagi; M K Krzyzanowska; W J Mackillop
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Xile Zhou; Fanlong Liu; Caizhao Lin; Qihan You; Jinsong Yang; Wenbin Chen; Jiahe Xu; Jianjiang Lin; Xiangming Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  3 in total

1.  Identification of mRNA Signature for Predicting Prognosis Risk of Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Linlin Jiang; Peng Wang; Mu Su; Lili Yang; Qingbo Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Prognostic Factors Affecting Short- and Long-Term Recurrence-Free Survival of Patients with Rectal Cancer using Cure Models: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Salar Rahimikazerooni; Leila Ghahramani; Alimohammad Bananzadeh
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2020-09

3.  Creation of a rectal cancer registry in Italy by the Advanced International Mini-Invasive Surgery (AIMS) academy clinical research network.

Authors:  Giulio M Mari; Pietro Achilli; Dario Maggioni; Jacopo Crippa; Andrea T M Costanzi; Mauro A Scotti; Vittorio Giardini; Mattia Garancini; Eugenio Cocozza; Giacomo Borroni; Ilaria Benzoni; Mario Martinotti; Luigi Totaro; Matteo Origi; Michele Mazzola; Giovanni Ferrari; Antonio Ziccarelli; Roberto Petri; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Giacomo Pugliese; Antonello Forgione; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.