Literature DB >> 24201582

Extrapolation methods for setting ecological standards for water quality: statistical and ecological concerns.

E P Smith1, J Cairns.   

Abstract

: Extrapolation methods form the basis for most recent techniques used to set 'safe' levels of toxicants for ecosystems. Most methods use information from several single species toxicity tests to predict safety factors for protecting all species in all communities in a nation or group of nations. There are a number of statistical and ecological concerns with this approach. These include assumptions about the shape of the distribution of tolerance to a toxicant, the ability to extrapolate information on laboratory species and condition to field species and condition and to the condition of communities and ecosystems, and assumptions about the appropriateness of laboratory measures relative to ecosystem measures. The approach has not been validated for safety and, before the approach is fully applied, needs to be validated. Other methods can be used with the extrapolation approach to reduce uncertainties.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 24201582     DOI: 10.1007/BF00116425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  4 in total

1.  Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; W Slob
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 2.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria.

Authors:  N M van Straalen; C A Denneman
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Fate and biological effects of methyl parathion in outdoor ponds and laboratory aquaria. II. Effects.

Authors:  N O Crossland
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Polychlorinated biphenyls and DDT alter species composition in mixed cultures of algae.

Authors:  J L Mosser; N S Fisher; C F Wurster
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Evelyn H W Heugens; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Incorporation of the biomarker concept in ecotoxicology calls for a redefinition of terms.

Authors:  C A Van Gestel; T C Van Brummelen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Marine environmental risk assessment and acute water quality criterion for pentachlorophenol in coastal waters.

Authors:  R Beiras; T Tato
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Risk assessment of herbicides and booster biocides along estuarine continuums in the Bay of Vilaine area (Brittany, France).

Authors:  Th Caquet; M Roucaute; N Mazzella; F Delmas; C Madigou; E Farcy; Th Burgeot; J-P Allenou; R Gabellec
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Non-parametric kernel density estimation of species sensitivity distributions in developing water quality criteria of metals.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Fengchang Wu; John P Giesy; Chenglian Feng; Yuedan Liu; Ning Qin; Yujie Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.