Literature DB >> 24200506

Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing.

Alicia Gonzalez-Moreno1, Sara Aurtenetxe2, Maria-Eugenia Lopez-Garcia3, Francisco del Pozo4, Fernando Maestu5, Angel Nevado6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) provides a direct measure of brain activity with high combined spatiotemporal resolution. Preprocessing is necessary to reduce contributions from environmental interference and biological noise. NEW
METHOD: The effect on the signal-to-noise ratio of different preprocessing techniques is evaluated. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was defined as the ratio between the mean signal amplitude (evoked field) and the standard error of the mean over trials.
RESULTS: Recordings from 26 subjects obtained during and event-related visual paradigm with an Elekta MEG scanner were employed. Two methods were considered as first-step noise reduction: Signal Space Separation and temporal Signal Space Separation, which decompose the signal into components with origin inside and outside the head. Both algorithm increased the SNR by approximately 100%. Epoch-based methods, aimed at identifying and rejecting epochs containing eye blinks, muscular artifacts and sensor jumps provided an SNR improvement of 5-10%. Decomposition methods evaluated were independent component analysis (ICA) and second-order blind identification (SOBI). The increase in SNR was of about 36% with ICA and 33% with SOBI. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: No previous systematic evaluation of the effect of the typical preprocessing steps in the SNR of the MEG signal has been performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of either SSS or tSSS is mandatory in Elekta systems. No significant differences were found between the two. While epoch-based methods have been routinely applied the less often considered decomposition methods were clearly superior and therefore their use seems advisable.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Magnetoencefalography (MEG); Noise-reduction; Preprocessing; Signal-to-noise ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24200506     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

1.  Cingulate and cerebellar beta oscillations are engaged in the acquisition of auditory-motor sequences.

Authors:  María Herrojo Ruiz; Burkhard Maess; Eckart Altenmüller; Gabriel Curio; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of reconstructed magnetic field from sparse noisy boundary measurements on localization of active neural source.

Authors:  Hui-min Shen; Kok-Meng Lee; Liang Hu; Shaohui Foong; Xin Fu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  A Brief Introduction to Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Its Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Alfred Lenin Fred; Subbiahpillai Neelakantapillai Kumar; Ajay Kumar Haridhas; Sayantan Ghosh; Harishita Purushothaman Bhuvana; Wei Khang Jeremy Sim; Vijayaragavan Vimalan; Fredin Arun Sedly Givo; Veikko Jousmäki; Parasuraman Padmanabhan; Balázs Gulyás
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Automatic 1D Convolutional Neural Network-based Detection of Artifacts in MEG acquired without Electrooculography or Electrocardiography.

Authors:  Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher Whitlow; Joseph Maldjian; Albert Montillo
Journal:  Int Workshop Pattern Recognit Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-07-20

5.  Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Automatically Detect Eye-Blink Artifacts in Magnetoencephalography Without Resorting to Electrooculography.

Authors:  Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher Whitlow; Joseph Maldjian; Albert Montillo
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  Fine-tuning neural excitation/inhibition for tailored ketamine use in treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Rosalyn J Moran; Jessica R Gilbert; Erik D Fagerholm; Robert Leech; Steven Williams; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Association with emotional information alters subsequent processing of neutral faces.

Authors:  Lily Riggs; Takako Fujioka; Jessica Chan; Douglas A McQuiggan; Adam K Anderson; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  MEGnet: Automatic ICA-based artifact removal for MEG using spatiotemporal convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Alex H Treacher; Prabhat Garg; Elizabeth Davenport; Ryan Godwin; Amy Proskovec; Leonardo Guimaraes Bezerra; Gowtham Murugesan; Ben Wagner; Christopher T Whitlow; Joel D Stitzel; Joseph A Maldjian; Albert A Montillo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 7.400

9.  A multicenter study of the early detection of synaptic dysfunction in Mild Cognitive Impairment using Magnetoencephalography-derived functional connectivity.

Authors:  Fernando Maestú; Jose-Maria Peña; Pilar Garcés; Santiago González; Ricardo Bajo; Anto Bagic; Pablo Cuesta; Michael Funke; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Ernestina Menasalvas; Akinori Nakamura; Lauri Parkkonen; Maria E López; Francisco Del Pozo; Gustavo Sudre; Edward Zamrini; Eero Pekkonen; Richard N Henson; James T Becker
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.

Authors:  Niels Trusbak Haumann; Lauri Parkkonen; Marina Kliuchko; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.