Literature DB >> 24197283

Comparison of three techniques for administering radiolabeled substrates to sediments for trophic studies: Incorporation by microbes.

F C Dobbs1, J B Guckert, K R Carman.   

Abstract

Three principal methods have been used to administer substrates to sediments: injection, porewater replacement, and slurry. Here we assess how each of these techniques affects incorporation of radiolabels into macromolecules of marine sedimentary microbes. Eighty-five cores of intertidal sand were collected in a randomized-block, factorial design. One set of cores received(14)C-bicarbonate/(3)H-thymidine and was incubated in the light; another set received(14)C-acetate/(3)H-thymidine and was incubated in the dark. Following a 5-hour incubation, sediments were analyzed for incorporation of radiolabel into lipid fractions (neutral, glyco-, and polar) and DNA. The three methods of isotope administration were also applied to cores subsequently analyzed for polar lipid phosphates and phospholipid fatty-acid (PLFA) profiles. In general, incorporation was greatest when injections were made, consistent with the prediction that incorporation would decrease as specific activity of the radiolabeled substrate was diminished by dilution. The ratio of(14)C from acetate incorporated into polar and glycolipid fractions indicated that a significant disturbance accompanied the porewater and slurry techniques. Substantial amounts of(3)H were recovered in the neutral-lipid fraction, indicating that thymidine was catabolized by sedimentary microbes and tritiated products were incorporated by eukaryotes. There were no significant differences in PLFA profiles or estimates of microbial biomass among methods or controls. Incorporation of(3)H into DNA was similar with all combinations of methods and radiocarbon substrates.(14)C was extensively incorporated into DNA, indicating that photoautotrophs and heterotrophs utilized radiocarbon from bicarbonate and acetate, respectively, for de novo synthesis of DNA. Injection is suggested as the method of choice, as it presents more flexibility in its application than porewater replacement and disturbs the consortia of gradients in sediments to a significantly lesser degree than porewater replacement and slurry.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 24197283     DOI: 10.1007/BF02012837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  10 in total

1.  Microbial growth rates and biomass production in a marine sediment: evidence for a very active but mostly nongrowing community.

Authors:  J A Novitsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Observations of barophilic microbial activity in samples of sediment and intercepted particulates from the demerara abyssal plain.

Authors:  J W Deming; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Microbial activity at the sediment-water interface in halifax harbor, Canada.

Authors:  J A Novitsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Determining [H]Thymidine Incorporation into Bacterioplankton DNA: Improvement of the Method by DNase Treatment.

Authors:  P Servais; J Martinez; G Billen; J Vives-Rego
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Stimulation of bacterial DNA synthesis by algal exudates in attached algal-bacterial consortia.

Authors:  R E Murray; K E Cooksey; J C Priscu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Method for measuring mineralization in lake sediments.

Authors:  M J Harrison; R T Wright; R Y Morita
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-04

7.  Quantitative determination of microbial activity and community nutritional status in estuarine sediments: evidence for a disturbance artifact.

Authors:  R H Findlay; P C Pollard; D J Moriarty; D C White
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate.

Authors:  D C White; W M Davis; J S Nickels; J D King; R J Bobbie
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Comparison of three techniques for administering radiolabeled substrates to sediments for trophic studies: Incorporation by microbes.

Authors:  F C Dobbs; J B Guckert; K R Carman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Measurement of in situ rates of nitrification in sediment.

Authors:  K Henriksen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.552

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  The presence, nature, and role of gut microflora in aquatic invertebrates: A synthesis.

Authors:  J M Harris
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Use of the [(14)C]leucine incorporation technique to measure bacterial production in river sediments and the epiphyton.

Authors:  H Fischer; M Pusch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of three techniques for administering radiolabeled substrates to sediments for trophic studies: Incorporation by microbes.

Authors:  F C Dobbs; J B Guckert; K R Carman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Radioactive labeling of a natural assemblage of marine sedimentary bacteria and microalgae for trophic studies: An autoradiographic study.

Authors:  K R Carman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.552

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.