OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the performance of a novel automated software tool for epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantification compared to a standard manual technique at coronary CT angiography (cCTA). METHODS: cCTA data sets of 70 patients (58.6 ± 12.9 years, 33 men) were retrospectively analysed using two different post-processing software applications. Observer 1 performed a manual single-plane pericardial border definition and EFVM segmentation (manual approach). Two observers used a software program with fully automated 3D pericardial border definition and EFVA calculation (automated approach). EFV and time required for measuring EFV (including software processing time and manual optimization time) for each method were recorded. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed on the prototype software measurements. T test, Spearman's rho, and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The final EFVA (with manual border optimization) was strongly correlated with the manual axial segmentation measurement (60.9 ± 33.2 mL vs. 65.8 ± 37.0 mL, rho = 0.970, P < 0.001). A mean of 3.9 ± 1.9 manual border edits were performed to optimize the automated process. The software prototype required significantly less time to perform the measurements (135.6 ± 24.6 s vs. 314.3 ± 76.3 s, P < 0.001) and showed high reliability (ICC > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Automated EFVA quantification is an accurate and time-saving method for quantification of EFV compared to established manual axial segmentation methods. KEY POINTS: • Manual epicardial fat volume quantification correlates with risk factors but is time-consuming. • The novel software prototype automates measurement of epicardial fat volume with good accuracy. • This novel approach is less time-consuming and could be incorporated into clinical workflow.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the performance of a novel automated software tool for epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantification compared to a standard manual technique at coronary CT angiography (cCTA). METHODS:cCTA data sets of 70 patients (58.6 ± 12.9 years, 33 men) were retrospectively analysed using two different post-processing software applications. Observer 1 performed a manual single-plane pericardial border definition and EFVM segmentation (manual approach). Two observers used a software program with fully automated 3D pericardial border definition and EFVA calculation (automated approach). EFV and time required for measuring EFV (including software processing time and manual optimization time) for each method were recorded. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed on the prototype software measurements. T test, Spearman's rho, and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The final EFVA (with manual border optimization) was strongly correlated with the manual axial segmentation measurement (60.9 ± 33.2 mL vs. 65.8 ± 37.0 mL, rho = 0.970, P < 0.001). A mean of 3.9 ± 1.9 manual border edits were performed to optimize the automated process. The software prototype required significantly less time to perform the measurements (135.6 ± 24.6 s vs. 314.3 ± 76.3 s, P < 0.001) and showed high reliability (ICC > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Automated EFVA quantification is an accurate and time-saving method for quantification of EFV compared to established manual axial segmentation methods. KEY POINTS: • Manual epicardial fat volume quantification correlates with risk factors but is time-consuming. • The novel software prototype automates measurement of epicardial fat volume with good accuracy. • This novel approach is less time-consuming and could be incorporated into clinical workflow.
Authors: Amir A Mahabadi; Marie H Berg; Nils Lehmann; Hagen Kälsch; Marcus Bauer; Kaffer Kara; Nico Dragano; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Victor Y Cheng; Damini Dey; Balaji Tamarappoo; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Amit Ramesh; Nathan D Wong; Leslee J Shaw; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-04
Authors: Antonio Moscariello; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf; John W Nance; Peter L Zwerner; Mathias Meyer; Jacob C Townsend; Valerian Fernandes; Daniel H Steinberg; Christian Fink; Matthijs Oudkerk; Lorenzo Bonomo; Terrence X O'Brien; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John H Nichols; Bharat Samy; Khurram Nasir; Caroline S Fox; P Christian Schulze; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2008-08-19
Authors: Guido A Rosito; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Frederick L Ruberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ullrich Ebersberger; Dov Eilot; Roman Goldenberg; Alon Lev; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; Nicholas Y Gallagher; William T Halligan; Philipp Blanke; Marcus R Makowski; Aleksander W Krazinski; Justin R Silverman; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Jon D Klingensmith; Addison L Elliott; Amy H Givan; Zechariah D Faszold; Cory L Mahan; Adam M Doedtman; Maria Fernandez-Del-Valle Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-02-07
Authors: Alexander Norlén; Jennifer Alvén; David Molnar; Olof Enqvist; Rauni Rossi Norrlund; John Brandberg; Göran Bergström; Fredrik Kahl Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2016-09-15
Authors: James V Spearman; Matthias Renker; U Joseph Schoepf; Aleksander W Krazinski; Teri L Herbert; Carlo N De Cecco; Paul J Nietert; Felix G Meinel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jadranka Stojanovska; Ella A Kazerooni; Mohamad Sinno; Barry H Gross; Kuanwong Watcharotone; Smita Patel; Jon A Jacobson; Hakan Oral Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrew Bard; Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Maddalena Ardissino; Aaron Mark Lee; Francesca Pugliese; Damini Dey; Sandip Sarkar; Patricia B Munroe; Stefan Neubauer; Nicholas C Harvey; Steffen E Petersen Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-07-07