Literature DB >> 24192980

Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue using CT angiography: evaluation of a prototype software.

James V Spearman1, Felix G Meinel, U Joseph Schoepf, Paul Apfaltrer, Justin R Silverman, Aleksander W Krazinski, Christian Canstein, Carlo Nicola De Cecco, Philip Costello, Lucas L Geyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the performance of a novel automated software tool for epicardial fat volume (EFV) quantification compared to a standard manual technique at coronary CT angiography (cCTA).
METHODS: cCTA data sets of 70 patients (58.6 ± 12.9 years, 33 men) were retrospectively analysed using two different post-processing software applications. Observer 1 performed a manual single-plane pericardial border definition and EFVM segmentation (manual approach). Two observers used a software program with fully automated 3D pericardial border definition and EFVA calculation (automated approach). EFV and time required for measuring EFV (including software processing time and manual optimization time) for each method were recorded. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was assessed on the prototype software measurements. T test, Spearman's rho, and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The final EFVA (with manual border optimization) was strongly correlated with the manual axial segmentation measurement (60.9 ± 33.2 mL vs. 65.8 ± 37.0 mL, rho = 0.970, P < 0.001). A mean of 3.9 ± 1.9 manual border edits were performed to optimize the automated process. The software prototype required significantly less time to perform the measurements (135.6 ± 24.6 s vs. 314.3 ± 76.3 s, P < 0.001) and showed high reliability (ICC > 0.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Automated EFVA quantification is an accurate and time-saving method for quantification of EFV compared to established manual axial segmentation methods. KEY POINTS: • Manual epicardial fat volume quantification correlates with risk factors but is time-consuming. • The novel software prototype automates measurement of epicardial fat volume with good accuracy. • This novel approach is less time-consuming and could be incorporated into clinical workflow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24192980     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3052-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

Review 1.  Coronary computed tomography--present status and future directions.

Authors:  P Apfaltrer; U J Schoepf; R Vliegenthart; G W Rowe; J R Spears; C Fink; J W Nance
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl       Date:  2011-10

2.  Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.

Authors:  Bernard A Birnbaum; Nicole Hindman; Julie Lee; James S Babb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  How to interpret epicardial adipose tissue as a cause of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Xiaoshu Cheng; Kui Hong; Chahua Huang; Li Wan
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.439

4.  Association of epicardial fat with cardiovascular risk factors and incident myocardial infarction in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

Authors:  Amir A Mahabadi; Marie H Berg; Nils Lehmann; Hagen Kälsch; Marcus Bauer; Kaffer Kara; Nico Dragano; Susanne Moebus; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Raimund Erbel; Stefan Möhlenkamp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Quantification of epicardial fat by computed tomography: why, when and how?

Authors:  Mohamed Marwan; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2013-01-19

6.  Pericardial fat burden on ECG-gated noncontrast CT in asymptomatic patients who subsequently experience adverse cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Victor Y Cheng; Damini Dey; Balaji Tamarappoo; Ryo Nakazato; Heidi Gransar; Romalisa Miranda-Peats; Amit Ramesh; Nathan D Wong; Leslee J Shaw; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04

7.  Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Antonio Moscariello; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf; John W Nance; Peter L Zwerner; Mathias Meyer; Jacob C Townsend; Valerian Fernandes; Daniel H Steinberg; Christian Fink; Matthijs Oudkerk; Lorenzo Bonomo; Terrence X O'Brien; Thomas Henzler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Volumetric measurement of pericardial adipose tissue from contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  John H Nichols; Bharat Samy; Khurram Nasir; Caroline S Fox; P Christian Schulze; Fabian Bamberg; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2008-08-19

9.  Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Guido A Rosito; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Frederick L Ruberg; Amir A Mahabadi; Ramachandran S Vasan; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Fully automated derivation of coronary artery calcium scores and cardiovascular risk assessment from contrast medium-enhanced coronary CT angiography studies.

Authors:  Ullrich Ebersberger; Dov Eilot; Roman Goldenberg; Alon Lev; J Reid Spears; Garrett W Rowe; Nicholas Y Gallagher; William T Halligan; Philipp Blanke; Marcus R Makowski; Aleksander W Krazinski; Justin R Silverman; Fabian Bamberg; Alexander W Leber; Ellen Hoffmann; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  10 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Development and evaluation of a method for segmentation of cardiac, subcutaneous, and visceral adipose tissue from Dixon magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jon D Klingensmith; Addison L Elliott; Amy H Givan; Zechariah D Faszold; Cory L Mahan; Adam M Doedtman; Maria Fernandez-Del-Valle
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-02-07

3.  Automatic pericardium segmentation and quantification of epicardial fat from computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Alexander Norlén; Jennifer Alvén; David Molnar; Olof Enqvist; Rauni Rossi Norrlund; John Brandberg; Göran Bergström; Fredrik Kahl
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 4.  Prognostic value of epicardial fat volume measurements by computed tomography: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  James V Spearman; Matthias Renker; U Joseph Schoepf; Aleksander W Krazinski; Teri L Herbert; Carlo N De Cecco; Paul J Nietert; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantification of epicardial adipose tissue in coronary calcium score and CT coronary angiography image data sets: comparison of attenuation values, thickness and volumes.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Alfonso Farruggia; Domenico Albano; Emanuele Grassedonio; Antonella Palmeri; Erica Maffei; Massimo Galia; Salvatore Vitabile; Filippo Cademartiri; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Spectral analysis of ultrasound radiofrequency backscatter for the identification of epicardial adipose tissue.

Authors:  Jon D Klingensmith; Akhila Karlapalem; Michaela M Kulasekara; Maria Fernandez-Del-Valle
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Increased epicardial fat is independently associated with the presence and chronicity of atrial fibrillation and radiofrequency ablation outcome.

Authors:  Jadranka Stojanovska; Ella A Kazerooni; Mohamad Sinno; Barry H Gross; Kuanwong Watcharotone; Smita Patel; Jon A Jacobson; Hakan Oral
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Segmentation and quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houchun Harry Hu; Jun Chen; Wei Shen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Greasing the Skids: Deep Learning for Fully Automated Quantification of Epicardial Fat.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf; Andres F Abadia
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-11-27

10.  Automated Quality-Controlled Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pericardial Fat Quantification Using a Convolutional Neural Network in the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Andrew Bard; Zahra Raisi-Estabragh; Maddalena Ardissino; Aaron Mark Lee; Francesca Pugliese; Damini Dey; Sandip Sarkar; Patricia B Munroe; Stefan Neubauer; Nicholas C Harvey; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.