Erika R Shaver1, Richard C Sadler2, Alex B Hill3, Kendall Bell2, Myah Ray2, Jennifer Choy-Shin2, Joy Lerner2, Teresa Soldner2, Andrew D Jones1. 1. 1Department of Nutritional Sciences,University of Michigan School of Public Health,Ann Arbor,MI,USA. 2. 2Department of Family Medicine,Michigan State University College of Human Medicine,200 East 1st Street,Flint,MI 48502,USA. 3. 3Public Health Program,Wayne State University Integrative Biosciences Center,Detroit,MI,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to use a methodology that accurately and reliably describes the availability, price and quality of healthy foods at both the store and community levels using the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S), to propose a spatial methodology for integrating these store and community data into measures for defining objective food access. SETTING: Two hundred and sixty-five retail food stores in and within 2 miles (3·2 km) of Flint, Michigan, USA, were mapped using ArcGIS mapping software. DESIGN: A survey based on the validated NEMS-S was conducted at each retail food store. Scores were assigned to each store based on a modified version of the NEMS-S scoring system and linked to the mapped locations of stores. Neighbourhood characteristics (race and socio-economic distress) were appended to each store. Finally, spatial and kernel density analyses were run on the mapped store scores to obtain healthy food density metrics. RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed that neighbourhoods with higher socio-economic distress had significantly lower dairy sub-scores compared with their lower-distress counterparts (β coefficient=-1·3; P=0·04). Additionally, supermarkets were present only in neighbourhoods with <60 % African-American population and low socio-economic distress. Two areas in Flint had an overall NEMS-S score of 0. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying areas with poor access to healthy foods via a validated metric, this research can be used help local government and organizations target interventions to high-need areas. Furthermore, the methodology used for the survey and the mapping exercise can be replicated in other cities to provide comparable results.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to use a methodology that accurately and reliably describes the availability, price and quality of healthy foods at both the store and community levels using the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S), to propose a spatial methodology for integrating these store and community data into measures for defining objective food access. SETTING: Two hundred and sixty-five retail food stores in and within 2 miles (3·2 km) of Flint, Michigan, USA, were mapped using ArcGIS mapping software. DESIGN: A survey based on the validated NEMS-S was conducted at each retail food store. Scores were assigned to each store based on a modified version of the NEMS-S scoring system and linked to the mapped locations of stores. Neighbourhood characteristics (race and socio-economic distress) were appended to each store. Finally, spatial and kernel density analyses were run on the mapped store scores to obtain healthy food density metrics. RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed that neighbourhoods with higher socio-economic distress had significantly lower dairy sub-scores compared with their lower-distress counterparts (β coefficient=-1·3; P=0·04). Additionally, supermarkets were present only in neighbourhoods with <60 % African-American population and low socio-economic distress. Two areas in Flint had an overall NEMS-S score of 0. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying areas with poor access to healthy foods via a validated metric, this research can be used help local government and organizations target interventions to high-need areas. Furthermore, the methodology used for the survey and the mapping exercise can be replicated in other cities to provide comparable results.
Entities:
Keywords:
Geographic information systems; NEMS-S; Nutrition environment; Spatial analysis
Authors: Angela D Liese; Bethany A Bell; Timothy L Barnes; Natalie Colabianchi; James D Hibbert; Christine E Blake; Darcy A Freedman Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Latrice Rollins; Tara Carey; Adrianne Proeller; Mary Anne Adams; Margaret Hooker; Rodney Lyn; Olayiwola Taylor; Kisha Holden; Tabia Henry Akintobi Journal: J Community Health Date: 2021-02
Authors: Rachael D Dombrowski; Alex B Hill; Bree Bode; Kathryn A G Knoff; Hadis Dastgerdizad; Noel Kulik; James Mallare; Kibibi Blount-Dorn; Winona Bynum Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Richard C Sadler; Christopher Hippensteel; Victoria Nelson; Ella Greene-Moton; C Debra Furr-Holden Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Amy Saxe-Custack; Richard Sadler; Jenny LaChance; Mona Hanna-Attisha; Tiffany Ceja Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Joel Gittelsohn; Christina M Kasprzak; Alex B Hill; Samantha M Sundermeir; Melissa N Laska; Rachael D Dombrowski; Julia DeAngelo; Angela Odoms-Young; Lucia A Leone Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Amy Saxe-Custack; David Todem; James C Anthony; Jean M Kerver; Jenny LaChance; Mona Hanna-Attisha Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 4.135