Literature DB >> 24187609

Predicting performance on the Raven's Matrices: The roles of associative learning and retrieval efficiency.

Lindsey Lilienthal1, Elaine Tamez, Joel Myerson, Sandra Hale.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that performance on Williams and Pearlberg's (2006) complex associative learning task is a good predictor of fluid intelligence. This task is similar in structure to that used in studying the fan effect (Anderson, 1974), as both tasks involve forming multiple associations and require retrieval in the face of interference. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relations among complex associative learning, working memory, and fluid intelligence. Specifically, we asked whether retrieval efficiency, as measured by the fan effect, could account for the relation between complex associative learning and performance on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. Consistent with previous findings, complex associative learning predicted Raven's performance, but the fan effect did not account for this relation. Notably, the learning phase of the fan effect task was significantly correlated with both complex associative learning and Raven's performance, providing further support for the importance of learning as a predictor of fluid intelligence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative learning; fan effect; fluid intelligence

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187609      PMCID: PMC3811950          DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.791299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 2044-5911


  21 in total

1.  Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: the contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Gregory J Spillers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Mental models and the fan effect.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Why is working memory related to fluid intelligence?

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Jeffrey E Pink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

7.  Fact retrieval in younger and older adults: the role of mental models.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

8.  Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach.

Authors:  J Cantor; R W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Differential fan effect and attentional focus.

Authors:  Myeong-Ho Sohn; John R Anderson; Lynne M Reder; Adam Goode
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

10.  Mental model organization.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; D H Spieler; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Nathan S Rose; Elaine Tamez; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.