Literature DB >> 15581125

Differential fan effect and attentional focus.

Myeong-Ho Sohn1, John R Anderson, Lynne M Reder, Adam Goode.   

Abstract

As people study more facts about a concept, it takes longer to retrieve a particular fact about that concept. This fan effect (Anderson, 1974) has been attributed to competition among associations to a concept. Alternatively, the mental-model theory (Radvansky & Zacks, 1991) suggests that the fan effect disappears when the related concepts are organized into a single mental model. In the present study, attentional focus was manipulated to affect the mental model to be constructed. One group of participants focused on the person dimension of person-location pairs, whereas the other group focused on the location dimension. The result showed that the fan effect with the focused dimension was greater than the fan effect with the nonfocused dimension, which is contrary to the mental-model theory. The number of associations with a concept is indeed crucial during retrieval, and the importance of the information seems to be accentuated with attentional focus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15581125     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

Review 1.  The fan effect: a tale of two theories.

Authors:  G A Radvansky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-06

2.  Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models.

Authors:  G H Bower; M Rinck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Mental models and the fan effect.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Situation models and abstract ownership relations.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R S Wyer; J M Curiel; M F Lutz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.

Authors:  W Kintsch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect.

Authors:  N J Zbrodoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-11

7.  Mental model organization.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; D H Spieler; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Eye movements do not reflect retrieval processes: limits of the eye-mind hypothesis.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Dan Bothell; Scott Douglass
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04
  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of repetition on associative recognition in young and older adults: item and associative strengthening.

Authors:  Norbou G Buchler; Paige Faunce; Leah L Light; Nisha Gottfredson; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-03

3.  Memory for Items and Associations: Distinct Representations and Processes in Associative Recognition.

Authors:  Norbou G Buchler; Leah L Light; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Event models and the fan effect.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; Andrea E O'Rear; Jerry S Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-08

5.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Development of Working Memory for Verbal-Spatial Associations.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The neural correlates of competition during memory retrieval are modulated by attention to the cues.

Authors:  Jared F Danker; Jon M Fincham; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The effects of memory set size and information structure on learning and retention.

Authors:  James A Kole; Alce F Haly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

9.  Using prior knowledge to minimize interference when learning large amounts of information.

Authors:  James A Kole; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  Predicting performance on the Raven's Matrices: The roles of associative learning and retrieval efficiency.

Authors:  Lindsey Lilienthal; Elaine Tamez; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.