Literature DB >> 8409850

Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach.

J Cantor1, R W Engle.   

Abstract

One explanation of the correlation often observed between working-memory span scores and reading comprehension is that individuals differ in level of activation available for long-term memory units. Two experiments used the fan manipulation to test this idea. In Experiment 1, high- and low-working-memory Ss learned a set of unrelated sentences varying in the number of shared concepts (fan) and then performed speeded recognition for those sentences. Low-working-memory Ss showed a larger increase in recognition time as fan increased. When the slope of the fan effect was partialed out of the relationship between working-memory span and verbal abilities, the relationship was reduced to nonsignificance. In Experiment 2, Ss learned thematically related sentences that varied in fan. Low-span Ss showed the positive fan effect typically found with thematically unrelated sentences, whereas high-span Ss showed a negative fan effect. The results are discussed in terms of a general capacity theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8409850     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  41 in total

1.  The effect of memory load on negative priming: an individual differences investigation.

Authors:  A R Conway; S W Tuholski; R J Shisler; R W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-11

2.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration.

Authors:  S W Tuholski; R W Engle; G C Baylis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

Review 3.  The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory.

Authors:  M Wilson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

4.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Dimitrios K Donavos; Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

5.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Michele M Tugade; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Working memory and phonological processing as predictors of children's mathematical problem solving at different ages.

Authors:  H Lee Swanson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

7.  Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

8.  Availability of related long-term memory during and after attention focus in working memory.

Authors:  Dan J Woltz; Christopher A Was
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

9.  Modeling individual differences in working memory performance: a source activation account.

Authors:  Larry Z Daily; Marsha C Lovett; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2001

10.  Cognitive control influences the use of meaning relations during spoken sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.