Literature DB >> 24186259

Gametic imprinting effects on rate and composition of pig growth.

A G de Vries1, R Kerr, B Tier, T Long, T H Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Genetic improvement schemes in livestock are based on the assumption that the expression of relevant genes is independent of parent of origin. Until now no evidence has been found to reject this assumption. The present study on three purebred pig populations, however, shows that a significant proportion of the phenotypic variance in backfat thickness (5-7%) can be explained by genes subject to paternal imprinting. The implication is that there are genes affecting backfat that are expressed only when derived from the paternal gamete. Paternal imprinted effects explained 1-4% of the phenotypic variation for growth rate. Maternal imprinted effects were heavily confounded with heritable maternal environmental effects. When modelled separately, these effects explained 2-5% and 3-4% of the phenotypic variance in backfat thickness and growth rate, respectively. Gametic imprinting may have consequences for the optimization of breeding programmes, especially in crossbreeding systems with specialized sire and dam lines.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 24186259     DOI: 10.1007/BF00220813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  13 in total

1.  Genetic imprinting suggested by maternal heterodisomy in nondeletion Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  R D Nicholls; J H Knoll; M G Butler; S Karam; M Lalande
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Analysing gametic variation with an animal model.

Authors:  B Tier; J Sölkner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Degree of methylation of transgenes is dependent on gamete of origin.

Authors:  C Sapienza; A C Peterson; J Rossant; R Balling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jul 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus.

Authors:  D P Barlow; R Stöger; B G Herrmann; K Saito; N Schweifer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis.

Authors:  M A Surani; S C Barton; M L Norris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Apr 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genomic imprinting determines methylation of parental alleles in transgenic mice.

Authors:  W Reik; A Collick; M L Norris; S C Barton; M A Surani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jul 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A growth-deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by targeting.

Authors:  T M DeChiara; A Efstratiadis; E J Robertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: II. Heritabilities and correlations.

Authors:  L L Lo; D G McLaren; F K McKeith; R L Fernando; J Novakofski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  An embryo transfer study of reciprocal cross differences in growth and carcass traits of Duroc and Landrace pigs.

Authors:  T M Wilken; L L Lo; D G McLaren; R L Fernando; P J Dziuk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Parental imprinting of the mouse insulin-like growth factor II gene.

Authors:  T M DeChiara; E J Robertson; A Efstratiadis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.

Authors:  Manus M Patten; David Haig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome Scan for Parent-of-Origin QTL Effects on Bovine Growth and Carcass Traits.

Authors:  Ikhide G Imumorin; Eun-Hee Kim; Yun-Mi Lee; Dirk-Jan De Koning; Johan A van Arendonk; Marcos De Donato; Jeremy F Taylor; Jong-Joo Kim
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Quantitative genetics of genomic imprinting: a comparison of simple variance derivations, the effects of inbreeding, and response to selection.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.

Authors:  Marcos S Lopes; John W M Bastiaansen; Luc Janss; Egbert F Knol; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Motohide Nishio; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  A new model for parent-of-origin effect analyses applied to Brown Swiss cattle slaughterhouse data.

Authors:  I Blunk; M Mayer; H Hamann; N Reinsch
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Consequences of paternally inherited effects on the genetic evaluation of maternal effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Sebastián Munilla; Joaquim Casellas; Carlos Moreno; Juan Altarriba
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 9.  Epigenetics and inheritance of phenotype variation in livestock.

Authors:  Kostas A Triantaphyllopoulos; Ioannis Ikonomopoulos; Andrew J Bannister
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.954

10.  Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.

Authors:  Xiangyu Guo; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Yachun Wang; Mogens Sandø Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.297

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.