Literature DB >> 12607852

Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.

Kyung-Suk Cha1.   

Abstract

This cephalometric study evaluated skeletal and dentoalveolar changes produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy in 85 subjects exhibiting a Class III malocclusion with a retruded maxilla. The skeletal maturity of individual patients was assessed on the basis of Fishman's skeletal maturity indicator (SMI), using hand-wrist radiographs at the initiation of treatment, to determine the relationship between the effect of maxillary protraction and skeletal age. Patients were divided into three groups: prepubertal growth peak group (SMI 1-3), pubertal growth peak group (SMI 4-7), and postpubertal growth peak group (SMI 8-11). The major findings of this cephalometric study were as follows: (1) there was no difference in the effects of maxillary advancement after maxillary protraction between the prepubertal growth peak and the pubertal growth peak group, but there was a decrease in the postpubertal growth peak group; (2) in the postpubertal growth peak group, there was a decrease in maxillary skeletal advancement, whereas the dentoalveolar effect was increased; (3) the posteroinferior rotation of mandible, the increase of lower facial height, and the eruption of maxillary molars showed no correlation with skeletal age. The results of our study emphasize the importance of performing a biologic evaluation of skeletal maturity and pubertal growth peak in individual patients in the diagnosis and treatment planning of Class III malocclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12607852     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0026:SCOMPI>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  23 in total

1.  Alternative treatment for open bite Class III malocclusion in a child with Williams-Beuren syndrome.

Authors:  Giovanni Modesto Vieira; Eduardo Jacomino Franco; Denise Falcão Pinheiro da Rocha; Laudimar Alves de Oliveira; Rivadávio Fernandes Batista Amorim
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

3.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.

Authors:  Koray Halicioglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Ismail Ceylan; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage.

Authors:  Sang-Duck Koh; Dong Hwa Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.