Literature DB >> 25929712

Dental compensation for skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth. Part 1: Occlusal situation 12 years after completion of active treatment.

Bernd Zimmer1, Sarah Schenk-Kazan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to statistically evaluate the outcomes achieved by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth (second premolars or first molars) for Class III compensation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Part A of the study dealt with the quality of outcomes at the end of active treatment, using weighted Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) scores determined on the basis of casts for 25 (14 female and 11 male) consecutive patients aged 16 ± 1.7 years at the time of debonding. These results were compared to the scores in a randomly selected control group of 25 (14 female and 11 male) patients who were 14.7 ± 1.9 years old at debonding. Part B evaluated the long-term stability of the outcomes based on 12 (all of them female) patients available for examination after a mean of 11.8 years. The mean weighted PAR scores obtained in both study parts were analyzed for statistical differences using a two-tailed paired Student's t-test at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Mean weighted PAR scores of 4.76 ± 3.94 and 3.92 ± 3.44 were obtained in the Class III extraction group and the control group, respectively, at the end of active treatment. This difference was not significant (p = 0.49). Among the 12 longitudinal patients, the mean score increased from 4 ± 3.46 at debonding to 6.25 ± 3.67 by the end of the 11.8-year follow-up period. This difference was significant (p = 0.0008).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of Class III anomalies by isolated extraction of lower premolars or molars can yield PAR scores similar to those achieved by standard therapies. These scores, while increasing significantly, remained at a clinically acceptable level over 11.8 years. Hence this treatment modality--intended for cases that border on requiring orthognathic surgery--may also be recommended from a long-term point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929712     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-015-0287-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  39 in total

1.  The effects of facemask and reverse chin cup on maxillary deficient patients.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Abdolreza Jamilian; Mehrangiz Ghassemi; Alireza Ghassemi; Tannaz Taban; Zahra Imani
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2012-06

2.  Early treatment protocol for skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Ricardo de Lima Navarro; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Leandra Sant'Anna Ferreira Parron Fernandes
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2013

3.  Factors associated with orthodontic stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients.

Authors:  Nair Galvão Maia; Antonio David Corrêa Normando; Francisco Ajalmar Maia; Maria Angêla Fernandes Ferreira; Maria Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2010

4.  Finishing occlusion, degree of stability and the PAR index.

Authors:  M Woods; D Lee; E Crawford
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2000-03

5.  Case report: developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  S Sato
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Developing skeletal Class III malocclusion treated nonsurgically with a combination of a protraction facemask and a multiloop edgewise archwire.

Authors:  Zhenhua Yang; Yin Ding; Xue Feng
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions--a systematic review.

Authors:  Piotr Fudalej; Magdalena Dragan; Barbara Wedrychowska-Szulc
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Chin-Yun Pan; Szu-Ting Chou; Chen-Yi Liao; Sheng-Tsung Lai; Chun-Ming Chen; Hong-Po Chang; Yi-Hsin Yang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The segmented arch approach: a method for orthodontic treatment of a severe Class III open-bite malocclusion.

Authors:  Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; José María Barrera-Mora; José María Llamas-Carreras; María Belén Ruiz-Navarro
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  2 in total

1.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Stability of orthodontic treatment and dental extractions.

Authors:  David Normando; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.