Literature DB >> 10842110

Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study.

M Saadia1, E Torres.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the sagittal response of Class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentition phases fitted with a protraction mask and expansion. The before-and-after cephalometric records of 112 patients divided by gender were analyzed at age groups 3 to 6, 6 to 9, and 9 to 12 years to assess the maxillary, mandibular, and intermaxillary sagittal changes. Data were correlated by means of paired t tests and Scheff¿e multiple contrasts. The study showed: (1) descriptive statistics and the before-and-after results in males and females in the different age groups; (2) the changes in males and females, disregarding age; and (3) the changes at the different ages, disregarding gender. Results show no significant differences between males and females in most of the angular and linear measurements at different ages. Greater significant changes were seen in patients treated in the primary and mixed dentition phases. Females showed highly significant changes in most linear and angular measurements between the ages of 3 and 6 years (P <.0001) compared with males (P <.05 ) at the same age. Significant changes were seen in the angle between the anterior part of the maxilla and the base of the skull (SNA), the maxillary depth, and the facial convexity angles, being more active in females than males. In contrast, the angle between the anterior part of the mandible and the base of the skull (SNB) showed no significant changes in all age groups, with the exception of males between 3 and 6 years. Even if correction can be achieved in all age groups, we recommend that treatment be started as soon as the diagnosis is made and cooperation allows for it. Young patients show greater and faster results in less time. Esthetics are greatly enhanced, compliance is improved, and the possible psycho-social scars can be greatly reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  23 in total

1.  Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: 10-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Ricardo de Lima Navarro; José Gustavo Dala Déa Camacho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 2.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Orthodontic considerations for maxillary distraction osteogenesis in growing patients with cleft lip and palate using internal distractors.

Authors:  Adriana da Silveira; Pollyana Marques de Moura; Raymond J Harshbarger
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

8.  Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Dong-Yul Lee; Eun-Soo Kim; Yong-Kyu Lim; Sug-Joon Ahn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Nam-Ki Lee; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.