BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a major public health problem that affects 1% of the population and has no effective therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of oral desensitization in peanut-allergic children in combination with a brief course of anti-IgE mAb (omalizumab [Xolair]). METHODS: We performed oral peanut desensitization in peanut-allergic children at high risk for developing significant peanut-induced allergic reactions. Omalizumab was administered before and during oral peanut desensitization. RESULTS: We enrolled 13 children (median age, 10 years), with a median peanut-specific IgE level of 229 kU(A)/L and a median total serum IgE level of 621 kU/L, who failed an initial double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at peanut flour doses of 100 mg or less. After pretreatment with omalizumab, all 13 subjects tolerated the initial 11 desensitization doses given on the first day, including the maximum dose of 500 mg peanut flour (cumulative dose, 992 mg, equivalent to >2 peanuts), requiring minimal or no rescue therapy. Twelve subjects then reached the maximum maintenance dose of 4000 mg peanut flour per day in a median time of 8 weeks, at which point omalizumab was discontinued. All 12 subjects continued on 4000 mg peanut flour per day and subsequently tolerated a challenge with 8000 mg peanut flour (equivalent to about 20 peanuts), or 160 to 400 times the dose tolerated before desensitization. During the study, 6 of the 13 subjects experienced mild or no allergic reactions, 5 subjects had grade 2 reactions, and 2 subjects had grade 3 reactions, all of which responded rapidly to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with high-risk peanut allergy, treatment with omalizumab may facilitate rapid oral desensitization and qualitatively improve the desensitization process.
BACKGROUND:Peanut allergy is a major public health problem that affects 1% of the population and has no effective therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and efficacy of oral desensitization in peanut-allergic children in combination with a brief course of anti-IgE mAb (omalizumab [Xolair]). METHODS: We performed oral peanut desensitization in peanut-allergic children at high risk for developing significant peanut-induced allergic reactions. Omalizumab was administered before and during oral peanut desensitization. RESULTS: We enrolled 13 children (median age, 10 years), with a median peanut-specific IgE level of 229 kU(A)/L and a median total serum IgE level of 621 kU/L, who failed an initial double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at peanut flour doses of 100 mg or less. After pretreatment with omalizumab, all 13 subjects tolerated the initial 11 desensitization doses given on the first day, including the maximum dose of 500 mg peanut flour (cumulative dose, 992 mg, equivalent to >2 peanuts), requiring minimal or no rescue therapy. Twelve subjects then reached the maximum maintenance dose of 4000 mg peanut flour per day in a median time of 8 weeks, at which point omalizumab was discontinued. All 12 subjects continued on 4000 mg peanut flour per day and subsequently tolerated a challenge with 8000 mg peanut flour (equivalent to about 20 peanuts), or 160 to 400 times the dose tolerated before desensitization. During the study, 6 of the 13 subjects experienced mild or no allergic reactions, 5 subjects had grade 2 reactions, and 2 subjects had grade 3 reactions, all of which responded rapidly to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among children with high-risk peanut allergy, treatment with omalizumab may facilitate rapid oral desensitization and qualitatively improve the desensitization process.
Authors: D W MacGlashan; B S Bochner; D C Adelman; P M Jardieu; A Togias; J McKenzie-White; S A Sterbinsky; R G Hamilton; L M Lichtenstein Journal: J Immunol Date: 1997-02-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Ernesto Enrique; Fernando Pineda; Tamim Malek; Joan Bartra; María Basagaña; Raquel Tella; José Vicente Castelló; Rosario Alonso; José Antonio de Mateo; Teresa Cerdá-Trias; María del Mar San Miguel-Moncín; Susana Monzón; María García; Ricardo Palacios; Anna Cisteró-Bahíma Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: S A Bock; H A Sampson; F M Atkins; R S Zeiger; S Lehrer; M Sachs; R K Bush; D D Metcalfe Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: David M Fleischer; Mary Kay Conover-Walker; Lynn Christie; A Wesley Burks; Robert A Wood Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Paolo Meglio; Paolo G Giampietro; Rossella Carello; Ida Gabriele; Simona Avitabile; Elena Galli Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Donald Y M Leung; Hugh A Sampson; John W Yunginger; A Wesley Burks; Lynda C Schneider; Cornelis H Wortel; Frances M Davis; John D Hyun; William R Shanahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amanda J Stranks; Samantha C Minnicozzi; Samuel J Miller; Oliver T Burton; Stephanie L Logsdon; Jonathan M Spergel; Kari C Nadeau; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Dale T Umetsu; Rima Rachid; Andrew J MacGinnitie; Lynda C Schneider; Hans C Oettgen Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2018-11-04 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: François Graham; Natacha Tardio; Louis Paradis; Anne Des Roches; Philippe Bégin Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michiko K Oyoshi; Hans C Oettgen; Talal A Chatila; Raif S Geha; Paul J Bryce Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 10.793